Nunes Mariana, Almeida Ricardo Faria, Felino Antonio Campos, Malo Paulo, de Araújo Nobre Miguel
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1156-63. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4336.
There is a need for more studies evaluating the marginal bone loss (MBL) of rehabilitations in the posterior regions of extremely resorbed maxillae and mandibles supported by short-length dental implants with a high crown/implant ratio (C/I-R). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the C/I-R in implants on MBL considering dental implants with 4 mm of width and 7 mm of length.
This retrospective cohort study included 59 patients (mean age of 52.8 years) rehabilitated with at least one implant 4 mm in width and 7 mm in length, with an anodically oxidized surface and external connection on the premolar or molar positions, supporting a fixed prosthesis, and in function for a period of 36 months. Periapical radiographs at 36 months were used to calculate the C/I-R and MBL. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between C/I-R and MBL. The level of significance was set at 5%.
One hundred eighteen implants from 59 patients were evaluated. The mean ± SD MBL was 0.67 ± 0.63 mm. The C/I-R mean ± SD was 2.53 ± 0.79 mm. Thirty implants presented a C/I-R ≤ 2, while 88 implants had a C/I-R > 2. A weak nonsignificant inverse correlation (r = -0.081; P = .383, Spearman) was registered between C/I-R and MBL.
Within the limitations of this study, it is possible to conclude that implant-supported fixed prostheses with C/I-R > 2 do not correlate positively with MBL.
需要开展更多研究,以评估短长度牙种植体支持且冠/种植体比率(C/I-R)较高的极度吸收的上颌骨和下颌骨后部区域修复体的边缘骨丢失(MBL)情况。本研究的目的是在考虑宽度为4 mm、长度为7 mm的牙种植体的情况下,评估种植体的C/I-R对MBL的影响。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了59例患者(平均年龄52.8岁),这些患者至少有一枚宽度为4 mm、长度为7 mm的种植体,种植体表面为阳极氧化处理且为外部连接,位于前磨牙或磨牙位置,支持固定修复体,且已使用36个月。使用36个月时的根尖片计算C/I-R和MBL。采用Spearman相关系数检验C/I-R与MBL之间的相关性。显著性水平设定为5%。
对59例患者的118枚种植体进行了评估。MBL的平均值±标准差为0.67±0.63 mm。C/I-R的平均值±标准差为2.53±0.79 mm。30枚种植体的C/I-R≤2,而88枚种植体的C/I-R>2。C/I-R与MBL之间存在弱的无显著意义的负相关(r = -0.081;P = 0.383,Spearman)。
在本研究的局限性范围内,可以得出结论,C/I-R>2的种植体支持的固定修复体与MBL之间无正相关关系。