• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短牙种植体与标准长度种植体治疗效果的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。

Outcomes of treatment with short dental implants compared with standard-length implants: a retrospective clinical study.

作者信息

Bérczy Kinga, Göndöcs György, Komlós György, Shkolnik Tatiana, Szabó György, Németh Zsolt

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, Semmelweis University, Mária Street 52, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 28;46(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00419-8.

DOI:10.1186/s40902-024-00419-8
PMID:38416263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10902233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The size of dental implants is a key success factor for appropriate osseointegration. Using shorter implants allows the possibility of avoiding complex surgical procedures and reduces the morbidity of treatment. Shorter implants also enable implant-prosthetic rehabilitation after maxillofacial reconstructions where only limited bone is available. In this study, the success rates of short implants were examined and compared to those of standard-sized implants.

METHODS

Patients who received dental implants between 2007 and 2016 at the Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology Semmelweis University were enrolled in the study. Several clinical parameters were recorded and supplemented with radiological examinations. The data were statistically analysed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with a total of 60 implants were included. The average time after prosthetic loading was 39.33 ± 21.96 months in the group with 8-mm implants and 41.6 ± 27.5 months in the group with > 8-mm implants. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of probing depth (short implants, 2.84 ± 0.09 mm; standard implants, 2.91 ± 0.35 mm) or mean marginal bone loss (short implants, 1.2 ± 1.21-mm mesially and 1.36 ± 1.47-mm distally; standard implants: 0.63 ± 0.80-mm mesially and 0.78 ± 0.70-mm distally).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the success rate of short dental implants was comparable to that of standard-sized implants. Consequently, it can be claimed that the long-term success of short dental implants does not differ significantly from the long-term success of standard implants.

摘要

背景

牙种植体的尺寸是实现适当骨整合的关键成功因素。使用较短的种植体有可能避免复杂的外科手术,并降低治疗的发病率。较短的种植体还能在颌面重建后仅获得有限骨量的情况下实现种植修复。在本研究中,对短种植体的成功率进行了检查,并与标准尺寸种植体的成功率进行了比较。

方法

纳入2007年至2016年在塞梅尔维斯大学口腔颌面外科和口腔医学系接受牙种植体植入的患者。记录了几个临床参数,并辅以放射学检查。对数据进行了统计分析。

结果

共纳入34例患者,植入60枚种植体。8毫米种植体组修复加载后的平均时间为39.33±21.96个月,大于8毫米种植体组为41.6±27.5个月。两组在探诊深度(短种植体,2.84±0.09毫米;标准种植体,2.91±0.35毫米)或平均边缘骨丢失方面(短种植体:近中1.2±1.21毫米,远中1.36±1.47毫米;标准种植体:近中0.63±0.80毫米,远中0.78±0.70毫米)未观察到显著差异。

结论

在本研究中,短牙种植体的成功率与标准尺寸种植体相当。因此,可以认为短牙种植体的长期成功率与标准种植体的长期成功率没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a316/10902233/f0e70885269b/40902_2024_419_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a316/10902233/689b81d07dda/40902_2024_419_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a316/10902233/f0e70885269b/40902_2024_419_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a316/10902233/689b81d07dda/40902_2024_419_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a316/10902233/f0e70885269b/40902_2024_419_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of treatment with short dental implants compared with standard-length implants: a retrospective clinical study.短牙种植体与标准长度种植体治疗效果的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 28;46(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00419-8.
2
Comparative Results of Single Implants With and Without Laser-Microgrooved Collar Placed and Loaded with Different Protocols: A Long-Term (7 to 10 years) Retrospective Multicenter Study.单植入体比较研究:有无激光微螺纹颈圈植入及不同负载方案的长期(7-10 年)回顾性多中心研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):841-849. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7605.
3
Clinical Outcome of Immediate Loading UV-Photofunctionalized Implants in Patients with Completely Edentulous Mandible, Placed with Guided Surgery.在完全无牙下颌患者中,采用引导手术植入经紫外线光功能化处理的即刻负重种植体的临床效果。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Mar;22(Suppl 1):64-75. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01798-z. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
The early loading of different surface-modified implants: a randomized clinical trial.不同表面改性种植体的早期负载:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01498-z.
5
Periodic Assessment of Peri-implant Tissue Changes: Imperative for Implant Success.种植体周围组织变化的定期评估:种植成功的必要条件
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Feb 1;20(2):173-178.
6
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Short Implants Placed in the Posterior Mandible: A 1-Year Pilot Split-Mouth Study.下颌后牙区短种植体的临床及影像学评估:一项为期1年的前瞻性半口对照研究
J Oral Implantol. 2018 Aug;44(4):250-259. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00037. Epub 2018 May 2.
7
The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading.牙槽嵴顶下植入对后牙区上颌骨和下颌骨短型锁定锥度种植体的影响:2年负载后软硬组织稳定性的回顾性评估
Minerva Stomatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;63(11-12):391-402.
8
Short vs. Standard Laser-Microgrooved Implants Supporting Single and Splinted Crowns: A Prospective Study with 3 Years Follow-Up.短款与标准款激光微螺纹种植体支持单冠和桥体修复:一项为期 3 年的前瞻性研究
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e771-e779. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12959. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
9
Short Versus Regular-Length Implants to Rehabilitate Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 2-Year Prospective Split-Mouth Clinical Study.短种植体与常规长度种植体修复下颌部分牙列缺失的 2 年前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Aug 1;48(4):277-284. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00315.
10
Peri-implant crevicular fluid levels of cathepsin-K, RANKL, and OPG around standard, short, and mini dental implants after prosthodontic loading.修复加载后标准、短型和微型牙种植体周围组织液中组织蛋白酶-K、核因子κB受体活化因子配体(RANKL)和骨保护素(OPG)的水平
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015 Oct;45(5):169-77. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.5.169. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of optimizing Bicon short implant placement in posterior mandible with type II bone.II型骨下颌骨后部区域Bicon短种植体植入位置优化分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 25;25(1):1239. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06559-1.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Stress at the Implant Bone Interface Between Short Implants and Long Implants Using BioHPP Abutment- An Study.使用BioHPP基台对短种植体和长种植体植入骨界面应力的比较评估——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1107-S1110. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_370_25. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
Influence of crown-implant ratio on photofuntcionalized short implants success rates: 5 year follow-up prospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, Zirconia Implants Treatment Outcomes: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.钛、钛锆、氧化锆种植体治疗效果的差异:一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2023 Sep 30;14(3):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2023.14301. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
2
Influence of diameter and length on primary stability in various implant site densities-An in vitro study in polyurethane blocks.不同种植体密度下直径和长度对初期稳定性的影响——聚氨酯块的体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Apr;26(2):327-332. doi: 10.1111/cid.13290. Epub 2023 Nov 5.
3
A 10-year survival rate of tapered self-tapping bone-level implants from medically compromised Korean patients at a maxillofacial surgical unit.
冠种植体比例对光功能化短种植体成功率的影响:5年随访前瞻性研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 May 13;29(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01395-7.
4
Exploring Non-conventional Dental Implants Beyond Traditional Paradigms Part I: Bridging the Gap in Bone Deficiency Cases.探索超越传统模式的非传统牙种植体 第一部分:弥补骨缺损病例的差距
Cureus. 2024 Nov 22;16(11):e74271. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74271. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Influence of Crown Height and Width on Marginal Bone Loss and Long-Term Stability of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.牙冠高度和宽度对牙种植体边缘骨丧失及长期稳定性的影响:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jul 22;16(7):e65109. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65109. eCollection 2024 Jul.
韩国颌面外科病房中医疗状况不佳患者使用的锥形自攻骨水平种植体的10年生存率。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Oct 6;45(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40902-023-00401-w.
4
Immediate placement of extra-short implants in refined scapula tip microvascular free flaps: In house virtual planning and surgical technique - Proof of concept.在精细肩胛尖微血管游离皮瓣中即刻植入超短种植体:内部虚拟规划与手术技术——概念验证
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 7;9(7):e18021. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18021. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Effect of Implant Length and Insertion Depth on Primary Stability of Short Dental Implant.种植体长度和植入深度对短牙种植体初期稳定性的影响
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Jan-Feb;38(1):62-70. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9769.
6
Clinical performance of short and extrashort dental implants with wide diameter: A systematic review with meta-analysis.宽直径短及超短牙种植体的临床性能:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Dec;132(6):1260.e1-1260.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
The evaluation of stress on bone level and tissue level short implants: A Finite Element Analysis (FEA) study.骨水平和软组织水平短种植体的应力评估:有限元分析(FEA)研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb;124(1S):101298. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.09.019. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
8
Clinical outcomes of different implant types in mandibular bar-retained overdentures: a retrospective analysis with up to 20 years follow-up.不同种植体类型在下颌杆卡式覆盖义齿中的临床效果:长达 20 年随访的回顾性分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Sep 23;8(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00439-x.
9
The Effect of Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution of Tooth-Implant and Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses: An In Vitro Finite Element Analysis Study.种植体长度和直径对牙种植体和种植体支持固定修复体的应力分布的影响:一项体外有限元分析研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2023 Feb 1;49(1):46-54. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00023.
10
Is titanium-zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis.钛锆合金作为口腔种植体的材料,会比纯钛更好吗?成分、力学性能及微观结构分析。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Nov;33(7):546-553. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 29.