Suppr超能文献

超短(<6mm)与短锁定锥度种植体在后牙区支持单冠的 5 年回顾性研究:存活率比较。

Survival rates of ultra-short (<6 mm) compared with short locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas: A 5-year retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology (DIPSCOMI), School of Dentistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Research Department, Dental Implant Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Dec;23(6):904-919. doi: 10.1111/cid.13054. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Short and ultra-short implants represent a predictable treatment, in terms of implant survival, with patients presenting insufficient available bone volumes. Moreover, single crown restorations represent a gold standard in terms of oral hygiene.

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate implant survival, marginal bone loss, and peri-implant complications in 333 locking-taper short and ultra-short implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Implants were placed in the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions of 142 patients. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at 5-year recall appointments.

RESULTS

All implants placed consisted of 8.0-, 6.0-, and 5.0-mm length, 38.14%, 34.53%, and 27.33%, respectively. Three hundred thirty-two implants (one early failure) were rehabilitated with single crowns in 141 patients. In 45.48% of the implants the crown-to-implant ratio was ≥2, with a mean value of 1.94. Overall implant-based survival after 5 years of follow-up was 96.10%: 96.85%, 95.65%, and 95.60% for 8.0-, 6.0-, and 5.0-mm length implants, respectively (p = 0.82). Overall patient-based survival was 91.55%. Regarding crestal bone level variations, average crestal bone loss and apical shift of the "first bone-to-implant contact point" position were 0.69 and 0.01 mm, respectively. Setting the threshold for excessive bone loss at 1 mm, during the time interval from loading to follow-up, 28 implants experienced loss of supporting bone greater than 1 mm: 19 of them (67.85%) were surgically treated with a codified surgical regenerative protocol. After 60 months, a peri-implantitis prevalence of 5.94% was reported, with an overall implant success of 94.06%: 95.93%, 92.73%, and 93.10% for 8.0-, 6.0-, and 5.0-mm length implants, respectively (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes suggest that short and ultra-short locking-taper implants can be successfully restored with single crowns in the posterior area of the maxilla and mandible.

摘要

背景

短种植体和超短种植体在患者骨量不足的情况下,是一种具有可预测性的治疗方法,在种植体存活率方面表现良好。此外,单冠修复体在口腔卫生方面是金标准。

目的

本回顾性研究旨在评估 333 个锁定锥形短种植体和超短种植体的种植体存活率、边缘骨丧失和种植体周围并发症。

材料与方法

将种植体放置在 142 名患者的上颌和下颌后牙区。在 5 年的随访中进行临床和影像学检查。

结果

所有植入物的长度分别为 8.0mm、6.0mm 和 5.0mm,分别占 38.14%、34.53%和 27.33%。141 名患者的 332 个种植体(1 个早期失败)采用单冠修复。在 45.48%的种植体中,冠-种植体比≥2,平均值为 1.94。5 年随访后,种植体总存活率为 96.10%:8.0mm、6.0mm 和 5.0mm 长度的种植体分别为 96.85%、95.65%和 95.60%(p=0.82)。种植体总存活率为 91.55%。关于牙槽骨水平的变化,平均牙槽骨丧失和“第一个骨-种植体接触点”位置的根尖移位分别为 0.69mm 和 0.01mm。在从加载到随访的时间间隔内,将骨量过度丧失的阈值设定为 1mm,28 个种植体经历了大于 1mm 的支持骨丧失:其中 19 个(67.85%)采用编码的外科再生方案进行了手术治疗。60 个月后,报告了 5.94%的种植体周围炎患病率,总体种植体成功率为 94.06%:8.0mm、6.0mm 和 5.0mm 长度的种植体分别为 95.93%、92.73%和 93.10%(p=0.55)。

结论

长期结果表明,短种植体和超短种植体可以成功地用单冠修复上颌和下颌后牙区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e04b/9299664/dc97abad2160/CID-23-904-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验