Thomas Abbey C, Pietrosimone Brian G, Bayer Carter J
1 Biodynamics Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC.
2 Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Sport Rehabil. 2016 Nov 1;25(4). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0121. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may provide important information regarding the corticospinal mechanisms that may contribute to the neuromuscular activation impairments. Paired-pulse TMS testing is a reliable method for measuring intracortical facilitation and inhibition; however, little evidence exists regarding agreement of these measures in the quadriceps.
To determine the between-session and inter-rater agreement of intracortical excitability (short and long interval intracortical inhibition [SICI; LICI] and intracortical facilitation [ICF]) in the dominant limb quadriceps.
Reliability study.
Research laboratory.
Thirteen healthy volunteers (n=6 female; age: 24.7±2.1 years; height: 1.7±0.1m; mass: 77.1±17.4kg).
Participants completed 2 TMS sessions separated by 1 week.
Two investigators measured quadriceps SICI, LICI, and ICF at rest and actively (5% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction). All participants were seated in a dynamometer with the knee flexed to 90°. Intracortical excitability paradigm and investigator order were randomized. Bland-Altman analyses were used to establish agreement.
Agreement was stronger between sessions within a single investigator than between investigators and for active compared to resting measures. Agreement was strongest for resting SICI and active ICF and LICI between sessions for each investigator.
Quadriceps intracortical excitability may be measured longitudinally by a single investigator, though active muscle contraction should be elicited during testing.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)可能提供有关皮质脊髓机制的重要信息,这些机制可能导致神经肌肉激活障碍。配对脉冲TMS测试是测量皮质内易化和抑制的可靠方法;然而,关于这些测量在股四头肌中的一致性的证据很少。
确定优势侧肢体股四头肌皮质内兴奋性(短和长间隔皮质内抑制[SICI;LICI]和皮质内易化[ICF])在不同测试时段之间以及不同评估者之间的一致性。
可靠性研究。
研究实验室。
13名健康志愿者(n = 6名女性;年龄:24.7±2.1岁;身高:1.7±0.1米;体重:77.1±17.4千克)。
参与者完成了间隔1周的2次TMS测试。
两名研究者测量了股四头肌在静息状态和主动状态下(最大自主等长收缩的5%)的SICI、LICI和ICF。所有参与者坐在测力计上,膝关节屈曲至90°。皮质内兴奋性范式和研究者顺序是随机的。采用Bland-Altman分析来确定一致性。
同一名研究者在不同测试时段之间的一致性比不同研究者之间更强,并且主动状态下的测量比静息状态下的测量一致性更强。每位研究者在不同测试时段之间,静息SICI以及主动ICF和LICI的一致性最强。
股四头肌皮质内兴奋性可由同一名研究者进行纵向测量,不过测试期间应引发肌肉主动收缩。