Agnisarman Sruthy Orozhiyathumana, Chalil Madathil Kapil, Smith Kevin, Ashok Aparna, Welch Brandon, McElligott James T
Clemson University, 110 Freeman Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, United States.
Clemson University, 110 Freeman Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, United States.
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:424-434. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
At-home telemedicine visits are quickly becoming an acceptable alternative for in-person patient visits. However, little work has been done to understand the usability of these home-based telemedicine solutions. It is critical for user acceptance and real-world applicability to evaluate available telemedicine solutions within the context-specific needs of the users of this technology. To address this need, this study evaluated the usability of four home-based telemedicine software platforms: Doxy.me, Vidyo, VSee, and Polycom. Using a within-subjects experimental design, twenty participants were asked to complete a telemedicine session involving several tasks using the four platforms. Upon completion of these tasks for each platform, participants completed the IBM computer system usability questionnaire (CSUQ) and the NASA Task Load Index test. Upon completing the tasks on all four platforms, the participants completed a final post-test subjective questionnaire ranking the platforms based on their preference. Of the twenty participants, 19 completed the study. Statistically significant differences among the telemedicine software platforms were found for task completion time, total workload, mental demand, effort, frustration, preference ranking and computer system usability scores. Usability problems with installation and account creation led to high mental demand and task completion time, suggesting the participants preferred a system without such requirements. Majority of the usability issues were identified at the telemedicine initiation phase. The findings from this study can be used by software developers to develop user-friendly telemedicine systems.
居家远程医疗问诊正迅速成为面对面患者问诊的一种可接受替代方式。然而,在了解这些基于家庭的远程医疗解决方案的可用性方面,所做的工作很少。在该技术用户的特定情境需求背景下评估可用的远程医疗解决方案,对于用户接受度和实际适用性至关重要。为满足这一需求,本研究评估了四个基于家庭的远程医疗软件平台的可用性:Doxy.me、Vidyo、VSee和宝利通。采用被试内实验设计,让20名参与者使用这四个平台完成一个涉及多项任务的远程医疗会话。在为每个平台完成这些任务后,参与者完成了IBM计算机系统可用性问卷(CSUQ)和NASA任务负荷指数测试。在完成所有四个平台的任务后,参与者完成了一份最终的测试后主观问卷,根据他们的偏好对平台进行排名。20名参与者中,19人完成了研究。在远程医疗软件平台之间,在任务完成时间、总工作量、心理需求、努力程度、挫败感、偏好排名和计算机系统可用性得分方面发现了统计学上的显著差异。安装和账户创建方面的可用性问题导致了较高的心理需求和任务完成时间,这表明参与者更喜欢没有此类要求的系统。大多数可用性问题是在远程医疗启动阶段发现的。本研究的结果可供软件开发人员用于开发用户友好型远程医疗系统。