Aleksic Ilija, Luthringer Tyler, Mouraviev Vladimir, Albala David M
SUNY Upstate Medical University, 766 Irving Ave, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
, 1226 East Water Street, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2014 Mar;8(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0439-7. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is presently considered the gold standard for the detection of lymph node invasion in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Controversy exists over the adequate extent of PLND for patients at different stages of PCa and over the therapeutic value of the procedure. The most recent consensus advocates extended PLND (ePLND) in a patient with Gleason score ≥7 and serum prostate-specific antigen >10 ng/ml who is undergoing radical prostatectomy. Critics claim more aggressive dissection is associated with an increase in complications, hospitalization time, and cost. The present review examines the debate of limited versus ePLND, and discusses the potential value of the latter for patients with PCa. Furthermore, it examines the utility of robotic-assisted surgery in performing PLNDs with both comparable oncological outcomes and comparable complication rates. The literature has reported promising results that support both diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of ePLND. However, prospective, multi-center, long-term studies are necessary to alleviate criticism of the increased risk of complications and costs of performing PLND.
盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)目前被认为是检测前列腺癌(PCa)患者淋巴结侵犯的金标准。对于不同分期的PCa患者,PLND的适当范围以及该手术的治疗价值存在争议。最新共识主张,对于接受根治性前列腺切除术、Gleason评分≥7且血清前列腺特异性抗原>10 ng/ml的患者,应进行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)。批评者称,更积极的清扫术会导致并发症、住院时间和费用增加。本综述探讨了局限性PLND与ePLND的争论,并讨论了ePLND对PCa患者的潜在价值。此外,还探讨了机器人辅助手术在进行PLND方面的效用,其肿瘤学结局和并发症发生率相当。文献报道了一些有前景的结果,支持ePLND的诊断和治疗益处。然而,需要进行前瞻性、多中心、长期研究,以消除对PLND并发症风险增加和费用上升的批评。