Suppr超能文献

接受根治性前列腺切除术患者盆腔淋巴结清扫术的解剖范围。

Anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Heidenreich Axel, Ohlmann Carsten H, Polyakov Sergej

机构信息

Division of Oncological Urology, Department of Urology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.020. Epub 2007 Apr 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The rationale for locoregional staging lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer (pCA) lies in the accurate diagnosis of occult micrometastases to stratify patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapeutic measures. In pCA, the issues of the necessity and the therapeutic advantage of pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND]) in patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease are still discussed controversially. The aim of this review manuscript is to critically evaluate the current status on PLND in pCA.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed concerning radical prostatectomy and PLND with respect to anatomical extent, oncological outcome, and associated complications.

RESULTS

The anatomical lymphatic drainage of the prostate includes the obturator fossa, and the external and internal iliac arteries; therefore, at least these areas should be included in PLND. According to the current clinical studies, extended PLND (ePLND) significantly increases the yield of both total lymph nodes and lymph node metastases independent of the risk classification of pCA. Lymph node metastases will be detected in about 5-6%, 20-25%, and 30-40% of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk pCA, respectively. Exclusively 25% of all positive lymph nodes are located in the area around the internal iliac artery. With regard to progression-free and cancer-specific survival, retrospective analysis of the SEER data and additional case-control studies indicate a direct positive relationship between the number of removed lymph nodes and long-term oncological outcome in patients with limited lymph node involvement or negative lymph nodes. In these patients, cancer-specific survival is improved by about 15-20%. On the basis of results of large case-control studies, complication rates of ePLND are not significantly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of current data, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) If performed, PLND has to be done in the extended, anatomically adequate variant. (2) The frequency of lymph node metastases in low-risk pCA is low, and the issue of PLND has to be discussed with the patient. (3) If radical prostatectomy is performed in intermediate- and high-risk pCA, an ePLND should be option of choice. For the future, ongoing prospective trials have to demonstrate a benefit in terms of biochemical-free and cancer-specific survival.

摘要

目的

前列腺癌(pCA)局部区域分期淋巴结清扫术的基本原理在于准确诊断隐匿性微转移,以便对可能从辅助治疗措施中获益的患者进行分层。在pCA中,低、中、高危疾病患者盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)的必要性及治疗优势问题仍存在争议。本综述性文章的目的是对pCA中PLND的现状进行批判性评估。

方法

针对根治性前列腺切除术和PLND,就解剖范围、肿瘤学结果及相关并发症进行了文献综述。

结果

前列腺的解剖学淋巴引流包括闭孔窝以及髂外动脉和髂内动脉;因此,PLND至少应包括这些区域。根据目前的临床研究,扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)显著提高了总淋巴结及淋巴结转移灶的检出率,这与pCA的风险分类无关。低、中、高危pCA患者的淋巴结转移检出率分别约为5 - 6%、20 - 25%和30 - 40%。所有阳性淋巴结中仅有25%位于髂内动脉周围区域。关于无进展生存期和癌症特异性生存期,对监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据的回顾性分析及其他病例对照研究表明,在淋巴结受累有限或淋巴结阴性的患者中,切除淋巴结的数量与长期肿瘤学结果之间存在直接正相关关系。在这些患者中,癌症特异性生存期提高了约15 - 20%。基于大型病例对照研究的结果,ePLND的并发症发生率并未显著增加。

结论

基于目前的数据,可得出以下结论:(1)如果进行PLND,必须采用扩大的、解剖学上足够的术式。(2)低危pCA患者的淋巴结转移频率较低,必须与患者讨论PLND问题。(3)如果对中、高危pCA患者进行根治性前列腺切除术,ePLND应作为首选方案。未来,正在进行的前瞻性试验必须在无生化复发生存期和癌症特异性生存期方面证明其益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验