Galvani Carlos A, Gallo Alberto S, Dylewski Mark R
Section of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2011 Sep;5(3):163-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0255-x. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is the standard surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia. The incidence of esophageal perforation is about 5-10%. Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy (RAHM) offers results at least as good as those from laparoscopic procedures, additionally yielding fewer intraoperative complications. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of RAHM and its value in the treatment of esophageal achalasia. We analyzed demographics, preoperative symptoms, esophagograms, esophageal manometry, intraoperative and postoperative data of all the patients who underwent RAHM for achalasia at three institutions: 36 women and 37 men, mean age 45 ± 16 (13-87) years. Dysphagia was present in 100% of patients. Thirty-three patients (45%) had had previous endoscopic treatment: 23 patients had pneumatic dilation, four patients had Botox injections, and six patients had both. Surgical time averaged 119 min (range of 62-211); blood loss averaged 23 ml; no mucosal perforations were observed; length of hospitalization was 1.5 days; there were no deaths. At 12 months, 96% of patients had relief of their dysphagia. In conclusion, RAHM is safe and effective since there were no intraoperative esophageal perforations and relief of symptoms was achieved in 96% of the patients.
腹腔镜下贲门肌层切开术是治疗食管贲门失弛缓症的标准外科手术。食管穿孔的发生率约为5%-10%。机器人辅助贲门肌层切开术(RAHM)的效果至少与腹腔镜手术相当,且术中并发症更少。本研究的目的是证明RAHM治疗食管贲门失弛缓症的安全性、可行性及其价值。我们分析了在三家机构接受RAHM治疗贲门失弛缓症的所有患者的人口统计学资料、术前症状、食管造影、食管测压、术中及术后数据:36名女性和37名男性,平均年龄45±16(13-87)岁。所有患者均有吞咽困难。33例患者(45%)曾接受过内镜治疗:23例患者接受过气囊扩张,4例患者接受过肉毒杆菌毒素注射,6例患者两者均接受过。手术时间平均为119分钟(范围62-211分钟);平均失血量为23毫升;未观察到黏膜穿孔;住院时间为1.5天;无死亡病例。术后12个月时,96%的患者吞咽困难得到缓解。总之,RAHM是安全有效的,因为术中无食管穿孔,且96%的患者症状得到缓解。