Suppr超能文献

贲门失弛缓症患者行机器人 Heller 肌切开术加部分胃底折叠术的临床和功能结果。

Clinical and functional outcome following robotic Heller-myotomy with partial fundoplication in patients with achalasia.

机构信息

Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1689-1696. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01557-3. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

Abstract

Robotic-assisted myotomy with partial fundoplication for patients with achalasia has been established as a safe and effective procedure with similar short-term results and lower rates of intraoperative esophageal perforations. Our aim was to investigate a defined patient cohort undergoing robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery providing pre- and postoperative symptom score and high-resolution manometry to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome.All patients underwent clinical, endoscopic, radiological and manometric investigation to verify the diagnosis of achalasia. High-resolution manometry was performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively and categorized according to the Chicago Classification (v4.0). We used the Eckardt Score to evaluate symptomatic outcome. All patients underwent either robotic-assisted or laparoscopic myotomy with partial anterior fundoplication (180° Dor) using the DaVinci Xi surgical system (Intuitive, Sunnyvale, California, USA). From a total amount of 101 patients, we analyzed the data of 78 (47 robotic and 31 laparoscopic) procedures between 2015 and 2020. All patients showed a significant decrease of the Eckardt Score in the robotic group (median 6 vs. 2) as well as in the laparoscopic group (median 7.5 vs. 3). The postoperative LESP and 4 s-IRP was significantly reduced in all patients in the robotic group [median LESP (mmHg) 34.16 vs. 16.9; median 4 s-IRP (mmHg) 28.85 vs. 14.55], as well as in the laparoscopic group [median LESP (mmHg) 35.34 vs. 17.3; median 4 s-IRP (mmHg) 25.6 vs. 15.9]. There was no significant difference for these parameters between the groups. There was no event of intraoperative esophageal perforation in the robotic cohort, whereas there were 2 in the laparoscopic group. Our data support the safe and effective robotic approach for the surgical treatment of achalasia. Not only the clinical outcome but also the functional results measured by high-resolution manometry are similar to the laparoscopic procedure. Further investigations in larger prospective multicenter studies are needed.

摘要

机器人辅助肌切开术联合部分胃底折叠术治疗贲门失弛缓症已被确立为一种安全有效的方法,其短期结果相似,但术中食管穿孔的发生率较低。我们的目的是研究一组接受机器人辅助和腹腔镜手术的特定患者,提供术前和术后症状评分以及高分辨率测压术,以评估临床和功能结果。所有患者均接受临床、内镜、放射学和测压检查,以验证贲门失弛缓症的诊断。高分辨率测压术在术前和术后 6 个月进行,并根据芝加哥分类(v4.0)进行分类。我们使用 Eckardt 评分评估症状结果。所有患者均接受机器人辅助或腹腔镜肌切开术联合部分前胃底折叠术(180°Dor),使用达芬奇 Xi 手术系统(Intuitive,加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔)。在总共 101 例患者中,我们分析了 2015 年至 2020 年期间 78 例(47 例机器人辅助和 31 例腹腔镜)手术的数据。所有患者的机器人组(中位数 6 对 2)和腹腔镜组(中位数 7.5 对 3)的 Eckardt 评分均显著降低。所有患者的机器人组[中位 LESP(mmHg)34.16 对 16.9;中位 4s-IRP(mmHg)28.85 对 14.55]和腹腔镜组[中位 LESP(mmHg)35.34 对 17.3;中位 4s-IRP(mmHg)25.6 对 15.9]的术后 LESP 和 4s-IRP 均显著降低。这些参数在两组之间无显著差异。机器人组无术中食管穿孔事件,而腹腔镜组有 2 例。我们的数据支持机器人辅助手术治疗贲门失弛缓症的安全有效方法。不仅临床结果,而且高分辨率测压术测量的功能结果也与腹腔镜手术相似。需要进一步在更大的前瞻性多中心研究中进行调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc3f/10374681/bdd2984ee03a/11701_2023_1557_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验