• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Rigged or rigorous? Partnerships for research and evaluation of complex social problems: Lessons from the field of violence against women and girls.

作者信息

Zimmerman Cathy, Michau Lori, Hossain Mazeda, Kiss Ligia, Borland Rosilyne, Watts Charlotte

机构信息

Gender Violence and Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.

Raising Voices, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 2016 Sep;37 Suppl 1:95-109. doi: 10.1057/s41271-016-0006-3.

DOI:10.1057/s41271-016-0006-3
PMID:27638245
Abstract

There is growing demand for robust evidence to address complex social phenomena such as violence against women and girls (VAWG). Research partnerships between scientists and non-governmental or international organizations (NGO/IO) are increasingly popular, but can pose challenges, including concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Drawing on our experience collaborating on VAWG research, we describe challenges and contributions that NGO/IO and academic partners can make at different stages of the research process and the effects that collaborations can have on scientific inquiry. Partners may struggle with differing priorities and misunderstandings about roles, limitations, and intentions. Benefits of partnerships include a shared vision of study goals, differing and complementary expertise, mutual respect, and a history of constructive collaboration. Our experience suggests that when investigating multi-faceted social problems, instead of 'rigging' study results, research collaborations can strengthen scientific rigor and offer the greatest potential for impact in the communities we seek to serve.

摘要

相似文献

1
Rigged or rigorous? Partnerships for research and evaluation of complex social problems: Lessons from the field of violence against women and girls.
J Public Health Policy. 2016 Sep;37 Suppl 1:95-109. doi: 10.1057/s41271-016-0006-3.
2
Academic-community collaboration. An ecology for early childhood violence prevention.学术-社区合作。一种预防幼儿期暴力的生态模式。
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Jan;20(1 Suppl):22-30. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00270-1.
3
Community-academic research partnerships with vulnerable populations.与弱势群体的社区-学术研究伙伴关系。
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2007;25:317-37.
4
Neighborhood solutions for neighborhood problems: an empirically based violence prevention collaboration.邻里问题的邻里解决方案:基于实证的预防暴力合作。
Health Educ Behav. 1999 Dec;26(6):806-20. doi: 10.1177/109019819902600605.
5
The anti-human trafficking collaboration model and serving victims: Providers' perspectives on the impact and experience.
J Evid Inf Soc Work. 2018 Mar-Apr;15(2):185-202. doi: 10.1080/23761407.2018.1432433. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Increasing research impact through partnerships: evidence from outside health care.通过合作增强研究影响力:来自医疗保健领域之外的证据。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Oct;8 Suppl 2:58-61. doi: 10.1258/135581903322405180.
7
Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews.对研究伙伴关系的承诺的证据?两项网络审查的结果。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jul 30;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5.
8
The Power of Academic-Practitioner Collaboration to Enhance Science and Practice Integration: Injury and Violence Prevention Case Studies.学术从业者合作促进科学与实践融合的力量:伤害与暴力预防案例研究
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jan/Feb;24 Suppl 1 Suppl, Injury and Violence Prevention(Suppl 1 INJURY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION):S67-S74. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000675.
9
Partnering with community-based organizations: an academic institution's evolving perspective.与社区组织合作:学术机构不断演变的视角。
Ethn Dis. 2007 Winter;17(1 Suppl 1):S27-32.
10
Coalition for a Healthier Community: Lessons learned and implications for future work.更健康社区联盟:经验教训及对未来工作的启示
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Aug;51:85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobilizing knowledge about urban change for equity and sustainability: developing 'Change Stories', a multi-country transdisciplinary study.调动关于城市变化的知识以促进公平与可持续性:开展“变化故事”这项多国跨学科研究。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Apr 24;9:218. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21180.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Shifting social norms to prevent age-disparate transactional sex in Tanzania: what we can learn from intervention development research.转变社会规范以预防坦桑尼亚年龄差距过大的交易性行为:我们能从干预发展研究中学到什么。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 2;14:926531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.926531. eCollection 2023.
3
Using social network analysis to understand multisectoral governance in district-level tobacco control programme implementation in India.
运用社会网络分析理解印度区级烟草控制规划实施中的多部门治理。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jan;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006471.
4
Victims of Physical Violence Have a Higher Risk to Be Perpetrators: A Study in High School Students Population.身体暴力受害者成为施暴者的风险更高:一项针对高中生群体的研究。
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 10;7(21):3679-3681. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.797. eCollection 2019 Nov 15.