Vandenhove Hildegarde, Turcanu Catrinel
Environment Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK•CEN, Mol, Belgium.
Nuclear Science and Technology Studies, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK•CEN, Mol, Belgium.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Oct;12(4):662-6. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1826.
The options adopted for recovery of agricultural land after the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents are compared by examining their technical and socio-economic aspects. The analysis highlights commonalities such as the implementation of tillage and other types of countermeasures and differences in approach, such as preferences for topsoil removal in Fukushima and the application of K fertilizers in Chernobyl. This analysis shows that the recovery approach needs to be context-specific to best suit the physical, social, and political environment. The complex nature of the decision problem calls for a formal process for engaging stakeholders and the development of adequate decision support tools. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:662-666. © 2016 SETAC.
通过研究切尔诺贝利事故和福岛事故后农业土地恢复所采用的方案的技术和社会经济方面,对这些方案进行了比较。分析突出了诸如实施耕作和其他类型的应对措施等共性,以及方法上的差异,例如福岛倾向于去除表土,而切尔诺贝利则施用钾肥。该分析表明,恢复方法需要因地制宜,以最适合物理、社会和政治环境。决策问题的复杂性要求有一个让利益相关者参与的正式过程,并开发适当的决策支持工具。《综合环境评估与管理》2016年;12:662 - 666。© 2016 SETAC。