Muram D
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38103.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Aug;161(2):278-81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90498-5.
We describe anal and perianal findings in 310 prepubertal children who were determined to be victims of sexual abuse; 206 (66%) had perinea that appeared normal. Abnormal findings were present in 104 children (34%): anal gapping in 61 children; skin tags in 44; rectal tears in 33; sphincter tears in 15; human papillomavirus lesions in 4; perineal scarring in 2; and bite marks in 1. Normal-appearing perianal and anal regions were noted in 150 of 175 children (85%) who denied anal assault, and in 11 of 70 (16%) who described such assault. In comparison, anal and perianal abnormalities were observed in 59 of the 70 children (84%) who gave a clear history of anal assault, but in only 25 of 175 (15%) who denied such abuse. Failure to document perianal abnormalities in almost two thirds of the patients demonstrates the limitations of the medical evaluation in validating allegations of sexual abuse.
我们描述了310名青春期前被认定为性虐待受害者的儿童的肛门和肛周检查结果;206名(66%)儿童的会阴外观正常。104名儿童(34%)存在异常表现:61名儿童有肛门张开;44名有皮赘;33名有直肠撕裂;15名有括约肌撕裂;4名有人乳头瘤病毒病变;2名有会阴瘢痕形成;1名有咬痕。在否认肛门侵犯的175名儿童中,150名(85%)的肛周和肛门区域外观正常,而在描述有此类侵犯的70名儿童中,11名(16%)正常。相比之下,在明确有肛门侵犯史的70名儿童中,59名(84%)观察到肛门和肛周异常,但在否认此类虐待的175名儿童中,只有25名(15%)出现异常。几乎三分之二的患者未记录到肛周异常,这表明医学评估在证实性虐待指控方面存在局限性。