Knoll Nina, Hohl Diana Hilda, Keller Jan, Schuez Natalie, Luszczynska Aleksandra, Burkert Silke
Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin.
School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania.
Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;36(1):8-20. doi: 10.1037/hea0000423. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
Action planning can help translate physical activity intentions into action by linking situational cues with behavioral responses. Dyadic planning extends action planning and refers to target persons forming plans for their own behavior change together with partners. This study investigated whether a dyadic planning intervention could increase physical activity in target persons and their partners, whether these effects were moderated by relationship quality and mediated by action control, activity-specific received partner support, and control.
Couples (n = 338; target persons randomized) were randomly assigned to (a) a dyadic planning condition (DPC); (b) an individual planning condition (IPC), in which target persons planned and partners worked on a distractor task; or (c) a control condition (CC), in which couples worked on a distractor task. During 3 assessments up to 6 weeks postintervention, moderate (primary outcome) and vigorous activity were objectively measured; other variables were self-reported. Multilevel and path models were fit.
There were no beneficial direct effects of the intervention for DPC target persons. Over time, DPC partners' vigorous activity increased, but decreased again. At lower relationship quality, DPC target persons' activity decreased, whereas IPC target persons' vigorous activity increased. Mediation hypotheses were not supported. Mutual influence models indicated positive effects of partners' on target persons' moderate activity in DPC and CC, whereas for IPC, negative effects of target persons' on partners' moderate activity emerged.
Findings revealed the complexity of effects of dyadic planning on behavior change. Adding relationship quality to the equation clarified effects of DPC and IPC on physical activity. (PsycINFO Database Record
行动计划可以通过将情境线索与行为反应联系起来,帮助将身体活动意图转化为行动。二元计划扩展了行动计划,指的是目标人群与伴侣共同制定自身行为改变的计划。本研究调查了二元计划干预是否能增加目标人群及其伴侣的身体活动,这些影响是否受到关系质量的调节,以及是否通过行动控制、特定活动所获得的伴侣支持和自我控制来介导。
夫妻(n = 338;目标人群随机分组)被随机分配到:(a)二元计划组(DPC);(b)个体计划组(IPC),其中目标人群制定计划,伴侣进行干扰任务;或(c)对照组(CC),夫妻双方进行干扰任务。在干预后长达6周的3次评估中,客观测量中等强度(主要结果)和剧烈活动;其他变量通过自我报告获得。拟合了多层次和路径模型。
干预对DPC目标人群没有有益的直接影响。随着时间的推移,DPC伴侣的剧烈活动增加,但随后又下降。在关系质量较低时,DPC目标人群的活动减少,而IPC目标人群的剧烈活动增加。中介假设未得到支持。相互影响模型表明,在DPC和CC中,伴侣对目标人群中等强度活动有积极影响,而对于IPC,目标人群对伴侣中等强度活动有负面影响。
研究结果揭示了二元计划对行为改变影响的复杂性。将关系质量纳入考量,明确了DPC和IPC对身体活动的影响。(PsycINFO数据库记录