From the Departments of Radiology (A.S.D., F.E.U., S.B., O.K., I.M., F.K.) and Neurology (S.D., M.N., B.K., N.U.), Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical School, 34300-Kocamustafapasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):494-501. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160135. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
Purpose To evaluate the value of shear-wave elastography (SWE) in the detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) of the tibial nerve. Materials and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The study included 20 diabetic patients with DPN (10 men, 10 women), 20 diabetic patients without DPN (eight men, 12 women), and 20 healthy control subjects (nine men, 11 women). The tibial nerve was examined at 4 cm proximal to the medial malleolus with gray-scale ultrasonography and SWE. The nerve cross-sectional area (in square centimeters) and the mean nerve stiffness (in kilopascals) within the range of the image were recorded. Inter- and intrareader variability, differences among groups, and correlation of clinical and electrophysiologic evaluation were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients, the Mann Whitney U test, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results Between diabetic patients with and diabetic patients without DPN, mean age (60 years [range, 38-79 years] vs 61 years [range, 46-75 years], respectively), mean duration of diabetes (10 years [range, 1-25 years] vs 10 years [range, 2-26 years]), and mean body mass index (31.4 kg/m [range, 24.7-48.1 kg/m] vs 29.8 kg/m [range, 22.9-44.0 kg/m]) were not significantly different. Diabetic patients without DPN had significantly higher stiffness values on the right side compared with control subjects (P < .001). Patients with DPN had much higher stiffness values on both sides compared with both diabetic patients without DPN (P < .001) and healthy control subjects (P < .001). A cutoff value of 51.0 kPa at 4 cm proximal to the medial malleolus revealed a sensitivity of 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.4%, 96.7%) and a specificity of 85.0% (95% CI: 74.9%, 91.7%). Conclusion Tibial nerve stiffness measurements appear to be highly specific in the diagnosis of established DPN. The increased stiffness in subjects without DPN might indicate that the nerve is affected by diabetes. RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
目的 评估剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在检测糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的胫骨神经中的价值。
材料与方法 本研究经机构审查委员会批准,并获得所有研究参与者的书面知情同意。该研究纳入 20 例糖尿病合并 DPN 患者(10 例男性,10 例女性)、20 例糖尿病不合并 DPN 患者(8 例男性,12 例女性)和 20 例健康对照者(9 例男性,11 例女性)。在距内踝 4cm 处,使用灰阶超声和 SWE 检查胫骨神经。记录图像范围内的神经横截面积(平方厘米)和平均神经硬度(千帕斯卡)。采用组内相关系数、Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验评估组内和组间的可重复性、组间差异以及临床和电生理评估的相关性。
结果 与糖尿病合并 DPN 患者相比,糖尿病不合并 DPN 患者的平均年龄[60 岁(范围,38-79 岁)与 61 岁(范围,46-75 岁)]、糖尿病病程[10 年(范围,1-25 年)与 10 年(范围,2-26 年)]和平均体重指数[31.4kg/m²(范围,24.7-48.1kg/m²)与 29.8kg/m²(范围,22.9-44.0kg/m²)]差异均无统计学意义。与对照组相比,糖尿病不合并 DPN 患者右侧的硬度值显著更高(P<0.001)。与糖尿病不合并 DPN 患者和健康对照组相比,DPN 患者双侧的硬度值均显著更高(P<0.001)。在距内踝 4cm 处,51.0kPa 的截断值可使诊断 DPN 的敏感度达到 90%(95%置信区间:75.4%,96.7%),特异度达到 85.0%(95%置信区间:74.9%,91.7%)。
结论 胫骨神经硬度测量在诊断已确立的 DPN 方面具有高度特异性。无 DPN 患者的神经硬度增加可能表明神经受到糖尿病的影响。
RSNA,2016 在线补充材料可在本文中获取。