• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量急症医院的安全氛围:安全态度问卷的拉施分析

Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire.

作者信息

Soh Sze-Ee, Barker Anna, Morello Renata, Dalton Megan, Brand Caroline

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 20;16:497. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1744-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-016-1744-4
PMID:27644437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5029072/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is commonly used to assess staff perception of safety climate within their clinical environment. The psychometric properties of the SAQ have previously been explored with confirmatory factor analysis and found to have some issues with construct validity. This study aimed to extend the psychometric evaluations of the SAQ by using Rasch analysis.

METHODS

Assessment of internal construct validity included overall fit to the Rasch model (unidimensionality), response formats, targeting, differential item functioning (DIF) and person-separation index (PSI).

RESULTS

A total of 420 nurses completed the SAQ (response rate 60 %). Data showed overall fit to a Rasch model of expected item functioning for interval scale measurement. The questionnaire demonstrated unidimensionality confirming the appropriateness of summing the items in each domain. Score reliabilities were appropriate (internal consistency PSI 0.6-0.8). However, participants were not using the response options on the SAQ in a consistent manner. All domains demonstrated suboptimal targeting and showed compromised score precision towards higher levels of safety climate (substantial ceiling effects).

CONCLUSION

There was general support for the reliability of the SAQ as a measure of safety climate although it may not be able to detect small but clinically important changes in safety climate within an organisation. Further refinement of the SAQ is warranted. This may involve changing the response options and including new items to improve the overall targeting of the scale.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12611000332921 (21 March 2011).

摘要

背景

安全态度问卷(SAQ)常用于评估员工对其临床环境中安全氛围的认知。此前已通过验证性因素分析对SAQ的心理测量特性进行了探索,发现其在结构效度方面存在一些问题。本研究旨在通过使用拉施分析来扩展对SAQ的心理测量评估。

方法

内部结构效度评估包括对拉施模型的整体拟合度(单维度性)、反应格式、目标定位、项目功能差异(DIF)和人员分离指数(PSI)。

结果

共有420名护士完成了SAQ(回复率60%)。数据显示,对于区间量表测量,整体符合预期项目功能的拉施模型。该问卷显示出单维度性,证实了对每个领域的项目进行求和的适当性。得分信度合适(内部一致性PSI为0.6 - 0.8)。然而,参与者并未以一致的方式使用SAQ上的反应选项。所有领域的目标定位都不理想,并且在安全氛围较高水平时得分精度受到影响(存在明显的天花板效应)。

结论

尽管SAQ作为安全氛围的一种测量方法的可靠性得到了普遍支持,但它可能无法检测到组织内安全氛围中微小但具有临床重要性的变化。有必要对SAQ进行进一步完善。这可能包括改变反应选项并纳入新项目,以改善量表的整体目标定位。

试验注册

本研究已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ACTRN12611000332921(2011年3月21日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b5f/5029072/c72d92848315/12913_2016_1744_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b5f/5029072/76c6d8d228f6/12913_2016_1744_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b5f/5029072/c72d92848315/12913_2016_1744_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b5f/5029072/76c6d8d228f6/12913_2016_1744_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b5f/5029072/c72d92848315/12913_2016_1744_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire.测量急症医院的安全氛围:安全态度问卷的拉施分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 20;16:497. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1744-4.
2
Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL).荷兰语版安全态度问卷(SAQ-NL)的验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 15;16(a):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1648-3.
3
Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study.评估安全态度问卷(SAQ),德语版,瑞士大学医院-验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-347.
4
Evaluation of the internal construct validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析评估个人护理参与评估与资源工具(PC-PART)的内部结构效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 5;14:543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0543-z.
5
Application of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in Albanian hospitals: a cross-sectional study.安全态度问卷(SAQ)在阿尔巴尼亚医院中的应用:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 15;5(4):e006528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006528.
6
The safety attitudes questionnaire - ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Slovenian version for the out-of-hours primary care setting.安全态度问卷 - 门诊版:斯洛文尼亚语版在非工作时间基层医疗环境中的心理测量特性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 13;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1972-7.
7
Validation of the Indonesian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: A Rasch analysis.验证印度尼西亚版安全态度问卷:Rasch 分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0215128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215128. eCollection 2019.
8
Sound psychometric properties of a short new screening tool for patient safety climate: applying a Rasch model analysis.一种新的简短患者安全氛围筛查工具的良好心理测量学特性:应用 Rasch 模型分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):742. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09768-y.
9
Validation study of the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) in public hospitals of Heilongjiang province, China.中国黑龙江省公立医院安全态度问卷(SAQ)的验证研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0179486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179486. eCollection 2017.
10
Nurse perceptions of safety climate in Australian acute hospitals: a cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚急症医院护士对安全氛围的认知:一项横断面调查。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Apr;42(2):203-209. doi: 10.1071/AH16172.

引用本文的文献

1
The Critical Role of Leadership in Patient Safety Culture: A Mediation Analysis of Management Influence on Safety Factors.领导力在患者安全文化中的关键作用:管理对安全因素影响的中介分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Mar 5;17:513-523. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S446651. eCollection 2024.
2
Development of the modified Safety Attitude Questionnaire for the medical imaging department.医学影像科改良安全态度问卷的编制
Singapore Med J. 2025 Jan 1;66(1):33-40. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-254. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
3
Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study.评估安全态度问卷(SAQ),德语版,瑞士大学医院-验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-347.
2
A dissonant scale: stress recognition in the SAQ.一个不和谐的量表:SAQ中的压力识别
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Jul 31;6:302. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-302.
3
Swedish translation and psychometric testing of the safety attitudes questionnaire (operating room version).瑞典语翻译和安全态度问卷(手术室版)的心理计量学测试。
格鲁吉亚版安全态度问卷的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e034863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034863.
4
Validation of the Indonesian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: A Rasch analysis.验证印度尼西亚版安全态度问卷:Rasch 分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0215128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215128. eCollection 2019.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Mar 19;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-104.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire - Short Form 2006 for Brazil.《安全态度问卷简表(2006年版)》针对巴西的跨文化调适
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):575-82. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692012000300020.
5
Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review.提高医院患者安全文化的策略:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):11-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000582. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
6
Investigating patient safety culture across a health system: multilevel modelling of differences associated with service types and staff demographics.调查整个医疗体系中的患者安全文化:与服务类型和员工人口统计学特征相关差异的多层次建模。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):311-20. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs028. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
7
Comparing two safety culture surveys: safety attitudes questionnaire and hospital survey on patient safety.比较两份安全文化调查:安全态度问卷和医院患者安全调查。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jun;21(6):490-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000449. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
8
The 6-PACK programme to decrease fall-related injuries in acute hospitals: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.6-PACK 方案以减少急性医院跌倒相关伤害:一项群组随机对照试验方案。
Inj Prev. 2011 Aug;17(4):e5. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040074. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
9
Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.组织文化:医院间的差异及其与患者安全氛围的联系
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):592-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.039511.
10
Hospital safety culture in Taiwan: a nationwide survey using Chinese version Safety Attitude Questionnaire.台湾地区医院安全文化:使用中文版安全态度问卷的全国性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 10;10:234. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-234.