• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素会调节决策中的自我-他人差异?疫苗接种场景的结果。

What Factors Moderate Self-Other Discrepancies in Decision Making? Results from a Vaccination Scenario.

作者信息

Petrova Dafina, Garcia-Retamero Rocio, van der Pligt Joop

机构信息

Universidad de Granada (Spain).

University of Amsterdam (The Netherlands).

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2016 Sep 20;19:E52. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.50.

DOI:10.1017/sjp.2016.50
PMID:27646872
Abstract

When we make risky decisions for others, we tend to follow social norms about risks. This often results in making different decisions for others than we would make for ourselves in a similar situation (i.e., self-other discrepancies). In an experiment, we investigated self-other discrepancies in young adults' decisions to purchase a vaccine against a sexually-transmitted virus for themselves or for another person (i.e., the target of the decision). When the target's preferences were in line with social norms, surrogates showed large self-other discrepancies in line with these norms. When the target's preferences were contrary to social norms, surrogates did not show self-other discrepancies in line with these preferences; instead they still followed social norms, F(1, 140) = 21.45, p < .001, η p 2 = .13. Surrogates with lower numeracy, F(2, 128) = 3.44, p = .035, η p 2 = .05, and higher empathy, F(2, 128) = 3.72, p = .027, η p 2 = .06, showed self-other discrepancies more in line with the target's preferences, even when these were contrary to the norm. Surrogates whose own risk attitudes were contrary to social norms showed larger self-other discrepancies, F(1, 128) = 5.38, p = .022, η p 2 = .04. These results demonstrate that perceived social norms about risk can predict self-other discrepancies in risky decisions, even when the target's preferences are known and at odds with the social norm. Further, the surrogates' numeracy, empathy, and propensity to take risks influence the extent to which risky decisions for others resemble risky decisions for oneself.

摘要

当我们为他人做出风险决策时,我们倾向于遵循关于风险的社会规范。这通常会导致我们为他人做出的决策与在类似情况下为自己做出的决策不同(即自我-他人差异)。在一项实验中,我们调查了年轻人为自己或他人(即决策对象)购买预防性传播病毒疫苗的决策中的自我-他人差异。当决策对象的偏好符合社会规范时,代理人表现出与这些规范一致的较大自我-他人差异。当决策对象的偏好与社会规范相悖时,代理人并未表现出与这些偏好一致的自我-他人差异;相反,他们仍然遵循社会规范,F(1, 140) = 21.45,p <.001,ηp2 =.13。算术能力较低的代理人,F(2, 128) = 3.44,p =.035,ηp2 =.05,以及同理心较强的代理人,F(2, 128) = 3.72,p =.027,ηp2 =.06,表现出更符合决策对象偏好的自我-他人差异,即使这些偏好与规范相悖。自身风险态度与社会规范相悖的代理人表现出更大的自我-他人差异,F(1, 128) = 5.38,p =.022,ηp2 =.04。这些结果表明,即使决策对象的偏好已知且与社会规范不一致,感知到的关于风险的社会规范仍能预测风险决策中的自我-他人差异。此外,代理人的算术能力、同理心和冒险倾向会影响为他人做出的风险决策与为自己做出的风险决策的相似程度。

相似文献

1
What Factors Moderate Self-Other Discrepancies in Decision Making? Results from a Vaccination Scenario.哪些因素会调节决策中的自我-他人差异?疫苗接种场景的结果。
Span J Psychol. 2016 Sep 20;19:E52. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.50.
2
Perceived Social Norms Guide Health Care Decisions for Oneself and Others: A Cross-Sectional Experiment in a US Online Panel.感知到的社会规范指导着自己和他人的医疗保健决策:美国在线面板中的一项横断面实验。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):326-340. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211067223. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
3
Choosing for you: Diminished self-other discrepancies in financial decisions under risk in the elderly.为您精选:老年人在风险金融决策中自我-他人差异缩小。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Sep;33(6):871-891. doi: 10.1037/pag0000284.
4
Predicting Australian adults' sun-safe behaviour: examining the role of personal and social norms.预测澳大利亚成年人的防晒行为:检验个人和社会规范的作用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 May;20(2):396-412. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12108. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
5
Gifts of giving: the role of empathy and perceived benefits to others and self in young adults' decisions to become organ donors.给予的礼物:同理心以及对他人和自身的感知益处对年轻人成为器官捐赠者的决定的作用。
J Health Psychol. 2013 Jan;18(1):128-38. doi: 10.1177/1359105311433910. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
6
Doc, what would you do if you were me? On self-other discrepancies in medical decision making.医生,如果您是我,您会怎么做?关于医疗决策中的自我-他人差异。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012 Mar;18(1):38-51. doi: 10.1037/a0026018. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
7
A social values analysis of parental decision making.父母决策的社会价值观分析。
J Psychol. 2014 Jul-Aug;148(4):477-504. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.808603.
8
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
9
Sexual activity and contraceptive use: the components of the decisionmaking process.性活动与避孕措施的使用:决策过程的组成部分。
Stud Fam Plann. 1998 Jun;29(2):154-66.
10
Bad guys suffer less (social pain): Moral status influences judgements of others' social suffering.坏人遭受的(社会痛苦)较少:道德地位会影响对他人社会痛苦的判断。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;55(1):88-108. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12114. Epub 2015 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of information presentation on self-other risk decision-making.信息呈现对自我-他人风险决策的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 9;15:1357644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357644. eCollection 2024.
2
Perceived Social Norms Guide Health Care Decisions for Oneself and Others: A Cross-Sectional Experiment in a US Online Panel.感知到的社会规范指导着自己和他人的医疗保健决策:美国在线面板中的一项横断面实验。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):326-340. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211067223. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
3
Exploring How Accountability Affects the Medical Decisions We Make for Other People.
探究问责制如何影响我们为他人做出的医疗决策。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 8;10:79. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00079. eCollection 2019.