Abiy Agiro, Qinli Ma, Sze-jung Wu, and John J. Barron, HealthCore, Wilmington, DE; Anupama Kurup Acheson, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; Debra A. Patt, Texas Oncology, Austin; Debra A. Patt, The US Oncology Network, Houston, TX; Jennifer L. Malin, Anthem, Woodland, CA; Alan Rosenberg, Anthem, Chicago, IL; Richard L. Schilsky, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and Gary H. Lyman, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research and University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 10;34(32):3872-3879. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.2899. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
Purpose To describe outcomes after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer who received chemotherapy regimens with low-to-intermediate risk of induction of neutropenia-related hospitalization. Patients and Methods We identified 8,745 patients age ≥ 18 years from a medical and pharmacy claims database for 14 commercial US health plans. This retrospective analysis included patients with breast cancer who began first-cycle chemotherapy from 2008 to 2013 using docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC); docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH); or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (conventional-dose AC) regimens. Primary prophylaxis (PP) was defined as G-CSF administration within 5 days of beginning chemotherapy. Outcome was neutropenia, fever, or infection-related hospitalization within 21 days of initiating chemotherapy. Multivariable regressions and number-needed-to-treat analyses were used. Results A total of 4,815 patients received TC (2,849 PP; 1,966 no PP); 2,292 patients received TCH (1,444 PP; 848 no PP); and 1,638 patients received AC (857 PP; 781 no PP) regimen. PP was associated with reduced risk of neutropenia-related hospitalization for TC (2.0% PP; 7.1% no PP; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.39) and TCH (1.3% PP; 7.1% no PP; AOR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.30), but not AC (4.7% PP; 3.8% no PP; AOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.93) regimens. For the TC regimen, 20 patients (95% CI, 16 to 26) would have to be treated for 21 days to avoid one neutropenia-related hospitalization; with the TCH regimen, 18 patients (95% CI, 13 to 25) would have to be treated. Conclusion Primary G-CSF prophylaxis was associated with low-to-modest benefit in lowering neutropenia-related hospitalization in patients with breast cancer who received TC and TCH regimens. Further evaluation is needed to better understand which patients benefit most from G-CSF prophylaxis in this setting.
描述接受低至中度诱导中性粒细胞减少相关住院风险化疗方案的乳腺癌患者使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)预防后的结局。
我们从 14 个美国商业健康计划的医疗和药房索赔数据库中确定了 8745 名年龄≥18 岁的患者。这项回顾性分析包括了 2008 年至 2013 年间接受多西他赛和环磷酰胺(TC);多西他赛、卡铂和曲妥珠单抗(TCH);或多柔比星和环磷酰胺(常规剂量 AC)方案的乳腺癌患者。初级预防(PP)定义为化疗开始后 5 天内给予 G-CSF。主要结局是化疗开始后 21 天内发生中性粒细胞减少、发热或感染相关住院。采用多变量回归和需要治疗的人数分析。
共 4815 名患者接受 TC(2849 名 PP;1966 名非 PP);2292 名患者接受 TCH(1444 名 PP;848 名非 PP);1638 名患者接受 AC(857 名 PP;781 名非 PP)方案。PP 与 TC(2.0%PP;7.1%非 PP;调整后的优势比[OR],0.29;95%置信区间,0.22 至 0.39)和 TCH(1.3%PP;7.1%非 PP;OR,0.19;95%置信区间,0.12 至 0.30)相关中性粒细胞减少相关住院风险降低相关,但与 AC(4.7%PP;3.8%非 PP;OR,1.21;95%置信区间,0.75 至 1.93)方案无关。对于 TC 方案,需要治疗 21 天才能预防 1 例中性粒细胞减少相关住院,20 例患者(95%置信区间,16 至 26)需要治疗;对于 TCH 方案,需要治疗 18 例患者(95%置信区间,13 至 25)。
初级 G-CSF 预防与 TC 和 TCH 方案治疗的乳腺癌患者中性粒细胞减少相关住院风险降低相关,但获益程度较低。需要进一步评估,以更好地了解在这种情况下,哪些患者最能从 G-CSF 预防中获益。