Coen Robert F, McCarroll Kevin, Casey Miriam, McNulty Helene, Laird Eamon, Molloy Anne M, Ward M, Strain J J, Hoey Leane, Hughes Catherine, Cunningham Conal J
1 Mercer's Institute for Research on Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
2 Northern Ireland Centre for Food and Health Centre, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2016 Nov;29(6):338-343. doi: 10.1177/0891988716666381. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) is a short battery designed to assess frontal executive functioning, but data for interpretation of performance are limited.
The Trinity, Ulster, Department of Agriculture (TUDA) study provided the opportunity to derive performance data from a large sample of community-dwelling hospital outpatient or general practitioner (GP) attenders.
Normative analysis based on 2508 TUDA participants meeting these criteria: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) >26/30, not depressed (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression <16) or anxious (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale <8), no history of stroke, or transient ischemic attack. Correlation and regression analyses were used to evaluate the effects of age, education, gender, and general cognition (MMSE). Norms for FAB were created stratified by age and education, using overlapping midpoint ranges of 10 years with a 3-year interval from age 60 to 97.
Age and education accounted for 9.6% of variance in FAB score ( r = .096) with no significant effect of gender. The FAB and MMSE were modestly correlated ( r = .29, P < .01) with MMSE increasing the model's total explained variance in FAB score from 9.6% to 14%.
This is the largest study to date to create normative data for the FAB. Age and education had the most significant impact on FAB performance, which was largely independent of global cognition (MMSE). These data may be of benefit in interpreting FAB performance in individuals with similar demographic/health status characteristics in hospital outpatient or GP settings.
额叶评估量表(FAB)是一种用于评估额叶执行功能的简短量表,但用于解释其表现的数据有限。
三一学院、阿尔斯特大学农业系(TUDA)的研究提供了一个机会,可从大量社区医院门诊患者或全科医生(GP)就诊者样本中获取表现数据。
基于2508名符合以下标准的TUDA参与者进行规范分析:简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)>26/30,无抑郁(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表<16)或焦虑(医院焦虑抑郁量表<8),无中风或短暂性脑缺血发作史。采用相关分析和回归分析来评估年龄、教育程度、性别和一般认知(MMSE)的影响。FAB的常模根据年龄和教育程度分层创建,使用60岁至97岁之间10年的重叠中点范围,间隔为3年。
年龄和教育程度占FAB评分方差的9.6%(r = 0.096),性别无显著影响。FAB与MMSE呈中度相关(r = 0.29,P < 0.01),MMSE使模型对FAB评分的总解释方差从9.6%增加到14%。
这是迄今为止为FAB创建规范数据的最大规模研究。年龄和教育程度对FAB表现影响最为显著,且在很大程度上独立于整体认知(MMSE)。这些数据可能有助于解释医院门诊或全科医生环境中具有相似人口统计学/健康状况特征个体的FAB表现。