Khan Samer R, Chaker Layal, Ruiter Rikje, Aerts Joachim G J V, Hofman Albert, Dehghan Abbas, Franco Oscar H, Stricker Bruno H C, Peeters Robin P
Rotterdam Thyroid Center (S.R.K., L.C., R.P.P.), Department of Epidemiology (S.R.K., L.C., R.R., A.H., A.D., O.H.F., B.H.C.S., R.P.P.), Department of Internal Medicine (L.C., R.P.P.), and Department of Pulmonology (J.G.J.V.A.), Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and Department of Epidemiology (A.H.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Dec;101(12):5030-5036. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2104. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
In vitro and in vivo experiments have assigned both oncosuppressive and oncogenic properties to thyroid hormones. Population-based studies have found inconclusive results.
We aimed to prospectively assess the relation between thyroid function and incident cancer in a population-based setting.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The current study is a prospective population-based cohort study including 10 318 participants for whom baseline measurements of free T (FT) and/or TSH were available.
Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess hazard ratios (HRs) of any solid non-skin cancer, as well as lung, breast, prostate, and gastrointestinal cancer specifically.
Higher FT levels were associated with a higher risk of any solid cancer (HR, 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.79), lung cancer (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.39-3.92) and breast (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.10-2.84) cancer. The risk estimates were similar after exclusion of thyroid-altering medication, but the association lost significance for breast cancer. Compared with the lowest FT tertile, the highest tertile was associated with a 1.13-fold increased risk of any solid, 1.79-fold increased risk of lung, and 1.14-fold increased risk of breast cancer (P for trend <.05 for all). For TSH levels we found no associations with cancer risk. There was no differential effect of sex or age on the association between thyroid function and cancer risk.
Higher FT levels are significantly associated with an increased risk of any solid, lung, and breast cancer. Further research should elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.
体外和体内实验已赋予甲状腺激素抑癌和致癌特性。基于人群的研究结果尚无定论。
我们旨在基于人群前瞻性评估甲状腺功能与新发癌症之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究是一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,纳入了10318名参与者,他们均有游离T(FT)和/或促甲状腺激素(TSH)的基线测量值。
采用Cox比例风险模型评估任何实体非皮肤癌以及特定的肺癌、乳腺癌、前列腺癌和胃肠道癌的风险比(HR)。
较高的FT水平与任何实体癌(HR,1.42;95%置信区间[CI],1.12 - 1.79)、肺癌(HR,2.33;95%CI,1.39 - 3.92)和乳腺癌(HR,1.77;95%CI,1.10 - 2.84)的风险较高相关。排除影响甲状腺的药物后,风险估计值相似,但乳腺癌的关联失去显著性。与FT最低三分位数相比,最高三分位数与任何实体癌风险增加1.13倍、肺癌风险增加1.79倍和乳腺癌风险增加1.14倍相关(所有趋势P值均<0.05)。对于TSH水平,我们未发现与癌症风险有关联。甲状腺功能与癌症风险之间的关联在性别或年龄上没有差异效应。
较高的FT水平与任何实体癌、肺癌和乳腺癌风险增加显著相关。进一步的研究应阐明潜在的病理生理机制。