2016年国际骶髂关节学会（ISASS）政策更新——微创骶髂关节融合术
ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.
作者信息
Lorio Morgan P
机构信息
ISASS Coding & Reimbursement Task Force Chair.
出版信息
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Jul 13;10:26. doi: 10.14444/3026. eCollection 2016.
Abstract
The index 2014 ISASS Policy Statement - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion was generated out of necessity to provide an ICD9-based background and emphasize tools to ensure correct diagnosis. A timely ICD10-based 2016 Update provides a granular threshold selection with improved level of evidence and a more robust, relevant database.
摘要
2014年国际骶髂关节学会（ISASS）政策声明——微创骶髂关节融合术是出于提供基于ICD-9的背景信息并强调确保正确诊断的工具的必要性而制定的。基于ICD-10的2016年更新及时提供了更精细的阈值选择、更高水平的证据以及更强大、更相关的数据库。
相似文献
1
ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.2016年国际骶髂关节学会（ISASS）政策更新——微创骶髂关节融合术
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Jul 13;10:26. doi: 10.14444/3026. eCollection 2016.
2
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.国际脊柱手术进展协会2020年政策更新——微创骶髂关节融合术（用于慢性骶髂关节疼痛）：覆盖范围、适应症、局限性及医疗必要性
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):860-895. doi: 10.14444/7156. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
3
ISASS policy statement - minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.国际骶髂关节学会政策声明——微创骶髂关节融合术
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1025. eCollection 2014.
4
ISASS Policy 2018-Vertebral Augmentation: Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity.ISASS 2018年椎体强化政策：覆盖适应症、限制条件及/或医疗必要性
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Feb 22;13(1):1-10. doi: 10.14444/5096. eCollection 2019 Jan.
5
Postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion.接受微创骶髂关节融合术患者的术后并发症
Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1324-1332. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Results Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.骶髂关节融合术：微创骶髂关节融合手术后一年的临床及影像学结果
Open Orthop J. 2016 Nov 30;10:679-689. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010679. eCollection 2016.
7
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study.三角钛植入物微创性骶髂关节融合术：一项前瞻性研究。
Global Spine J. 2016 May;6(3):257-69. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562912. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
8
ISASS Policy Statement - Cervical Artificial Disc.国际脊柱关节外科学会政策声明 - 颈椎人工椎间盘
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1006. eCollection 2014.
9
Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint.骶髂关节微创融合术中术中神经监测的效用
Adv Orthop. 2014;2014:154041. doi: 10.1155/2014/154041. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
10
ISASS Policy Statement 2022: Literature Review of Intraosseous Basivertebral Nerve Ablation.国际脊柱介入外科学会（ISASS）2022年政策声明：椎体内基底神经消融术的文献综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1084-1094. doi: 10.14444/8362. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Single Incision Posteromedial to Ventrolateral (PML) Surgical Technique for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.用于微创骶髂关节融合的单切口腹外侧至后内侧（PML）手术技术
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Aug 1;38(7):319-325. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001867. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
2
An Algorithmic Overview of Advanced Pain Therapies: A Narrative Review.高级疼痛治疗的算法概述：一篇叙述性综述。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Jan 27;29(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01343-2.
3
Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion: current insights and a comprehensive literature review.微创骶髂关节融合术：当前见解与全面文献综述
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jul 1;54(6):1185-1191. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5898. eCollection 2024.
4
Insights on High-Value Procedures From the ISASS 4-Part Webinar Series on Current and Emerging Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery Based on Surgeon Experience.基于外科医生经验，从国际脊柱外科学会（ISASS）关于内镜脊柱手术当前及新兴技术的四部分网络研讨会系列中获得的高价值手术见解。
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 20;18(S2):S66-S82. doi: 10.14444/8676.
5
Comparative Analysis of Learning Curve, Complexity, Psychological Stress, and Work Relative Value Units for CPT 62380 Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Decompression vs Traditional Lumbar Spine Surgeries: A Paired Rasch Survey Study.CPT 62380 内镜下腰椎减压术与传统腰椎手术的学习曲线、复杂性、心理压力及工作相对价值单位的比较分析：一项配对Rasch调查研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 May 6;18(2):138-151. doi: 10.14444/8594.
6
[Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ)].[骶髂关节微创融合术]
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Apr;34(2):98-108. doi: 10.1007/s00064-021-00738-3. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
7
Pain Relief Salvage with a Novel Minimally Invasive Posterior Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Device in Patients with Previously Implanted Pain Devices and Therapies.采用新型微创骶髂关节后路融合装置对曾植入止痛装置和接受过止痛治疗的患者进行疼痛缓解挽救治疗。
J Pain Res. 2021 Sep 2;14:2709-2715. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S325059. eCollection 2021.
8
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.国际脊柱手术进展协会2020年政策更新——微创骶髂关节融合术（用于慢性骶髂关节疼痛）：覆盖范围、适应症、局限性及医疗必要性
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):860-895. doi: 10.14444/7156. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
9
Long-term prospective outcomes after minimally invasive trans-iliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants.使用三角形钛植入物进行微创经髂骨骶髂关节融合后的长期前瞻性结果。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2018 Apr 9;11:113-121. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S160989. eCollection 2018.
10
The Assessment of Fusion Following Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.骶髂关节融合手术后融合情况的评估
Cureus. 2017 Oct 20;9(10):e1787. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1787.
本文引用的文献
1
Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.一项关于使用三角形钛植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术与保守治疗的随机对照试验的六个月结果。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):708-719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4599-9. Epub 2016 May 14.
2
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.用于微创骶髂关节融合的三角形钛植入物：一项前瞻性多中心试验的2年随访
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Apr 20;10:13. doi: 10.14444/3013. eCollection 2016.
3
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study.三角钛植入物微创性骶髂关节融合术：一项前瞻性研究。
Global Spine J. 2016 May;6(3):257-69. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562912. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
4
Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1924-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4490-8. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
5
Does Level of Response to SI Joint Block Predict Response to SI Joint Fusion?骶髂关节阻滞的反应程度能否预测骶髂关节融合的反应？
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Jan 21;10:4. doi: 10.14444/3004. eCollection 2016.
6
Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.微创骶髂关节融合术的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Dec 18;8:1-14. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S94266. eCollection 2016.
7
Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System(®).使用iFuse植入系统（®）进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的植入物存活率分析。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 Nov 23;8:485-92. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S94885. eCollection 2015.
8
Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion in women with persistent post-partum posterior pelvic girdle pain: 12-month outcomes from a prospective, multi-center trial.微创骶髂关节融合术治疗产后持续性骨盆后环疼痛女性的安全性和有效性：一项前瞻性多中心试验的12个月结果
Springerplus. 2015 Oct 5;4:570. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1359-y. eCollection 2015.
9
Quality of life in preoperative patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction is at least as depressed as in other lumbar spinal conditions.术前患有骶髂关节功能障碍患者的生活质量至少与其他腰椎疾病患者一样低落。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 Sep 16;8:395-403. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S92070. eCollection 2015.
10
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.使用三角形钛植入物的微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验：12个月的结果。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988.
Zotero 插件