Cinque Benedetta, La Torre Cristina, Lombardi Francesca, Palumbo Paola, Van der Rest Michel, Cifone Maria Grazia
Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Building Delta 6, Coppito, L'Aquila, Italy.
BioVisible BV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 22;11(9):e0163216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163216. eCollection 2016.
A careful selection of the probiotic agent, standardization of the dose and detailed characterization of the beneficial effects are essential when considering use of a probiotic for the dietary management of serious diseases. However, changes in the manufacturing processes, equipment or facilities can result in differences in the product itself due to the live nature of probiotics. The need to reconfirm safety and/or efficacy for any probiotic product made at a different factory is therefore mandatory. Recently, under the brand VSL#3®, a formulation produced by a manufacturer different from the previous one, has been commercialized in some European countries (the UK and Holland). VSL#3 is a high concentration multi-strain preparation which has been recognized by the main Gastroenterology Associations for the dietary management of pouchitis as well as ulcerative colitis. We have compared the "original" VSL#3 produced in USA with the "newfound" VSL#3 produced in Italy. According to our results, the "newfound" VSL#3 has 130-150% more "dead bacteria" compared to the "original" product, raising concerns for the well-known association between dead microbes with adverse effects. The abilities of bacterial lysates from the two formulations to influence in vitro viability and proliferation of different tumor cell lines also resulted different. The repair of previously scratched monolayers of various adherent tumor cell lines (i.e. HT1080, and Caco-2 cells) was inhibited more significantly by the "original" VSL#3 when compared to the "newfound" VSL#3. Tumor cell cycle profile, in particular cell cycle arrest and apoptotic death of the cancer cells, further confirms that the "original" VSL#3 has a better functional profile than the "newfound" VSL#3, at least in in vitro. Our data stress the importance of the production conditions for the "newfound" VSL#3 considering that this product is intended to be used for the dietary management of patients with very serious diseases, such as chronic inflammatory bowel diseases.
在考虑使用益生菌进行严重疾病的饮食管理时,仔细选择益生菌制剂、标准化剂量以及详细描述其有益效果至关重要。然而,由于益生菌的活性特性,制造工艺、设备或设施的变化可能导致产品本身存在差异。因此,对于在不同工厂生产的任何益生菌产品,重新确认其安全性和/或有效性是必不可少的。最近,一种由不同于先前制造商生产的制剂,以VSL#3®品牌在一些欧洲国家(英国和荷兰)商业化。VSL#3是一种高浓度多菌株制剂,已被主要胃肠病学协会认可用于袋状结肠炎以及溃疡性结肠炎的饮食管理。我们比较了美国生产的“原装”VSL#3和意大利生产的“新发现”VSL#3。根据我们的结果,与“原装”产品相比,“新发现”的VSL#3的“死菌”多130 - 150%,这引发了人们对死微生物与不良影响之间众所周知的关联的担忧。两种制剂的细菌裂解物影响不同肿瘤细胞系体外活力和增殖的能力也有所不同。与“新发现”的VSL#3相比,“原装”VSL#3对各种贴壁肿瘤细胞系(即HT1080和Caco - 2细胞)先前划痕单层的修复抑制作用更显著。肿瘤细胞周期谱,特别是癌细胞的细胞周期停滞和凋亡死亡,进一步证实至少在体外,“原装”VSL#3比“新发现”的VSL#3具有更好的功能特性。考虑到该产品旨在用于慢性炎症性肠病等非常严重疾病患者的饮食管理,我们的数据强调了“新发现”VSL#3生产条件的重要性。