Bigozzi Lucia, Tarchi Christian, Pinto Giuliana
Department of Education and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 22;11(9):e0163033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163033. eCollection 2016.
The paper reports the results of two studies on the spelling performance of 1st graders in a transparent writing system. The spelling performance of Italian children was assessed to determine the cross-task relationship between spelling to dictation and spontaneous spelling at the single word level (Study 1) and at the text level (Study 2), respectively. In study 1, 132 Italian children's spelling performance was assessed in 1st grade through two standardized tasks, i.e., word dictation, and spontaneous word spelling. In study 2, spelling performance of 81 Italian children was assessed in 1st grade through two tasks, i.e., text dictation, and spontaneous text spelling. In Study 1, spelling words and pseudo-words to dictation was found to be more difficult than spontaneous spelling of words. This effect was verified for all children (including low achievers and spelling impaired). The moderate correlation found between spelling to dictation and spontaneous spelling indicated that the two tasks are supported by partially different spelling processes and confirmed suggestions for including both types of spelling assessments in the school. In Study 2, children's spelling performances were not dependent across the two tasks (i.e., spelling a text under dictation or spontaneously). The two tasks shared the level of difficulty but performance in one task was not predictive of performance in the second task. Strong individual differences between children were found at the text level as a function of task. Similar to Study 1, the moderate correlation between spelling text to dictation and spontaneous spelling confirmed the usefulness of adopting both spelling assessments at school.
该论文报告了两项关于一年级学生在透明书写系统中拼写表现的研究结果。分别对意大利儿童的拼写表现进行评估,以确定在单词层面(研究1)和文本层面(研究2)听写拼写与自发拼写之间的跨任务关系。在研究1中,通过两项标准化任务,即单词听写和自发单词拼写,对132名意大利一年级儿童的拼写表现进行了评估。在研究2中,通过两项任务,即文本听写和自发文本拼写,对81名意大利一年级儿童的拼写表现进行了评估。在研究1中,发现听写拼写单词和假词比自发拼写单词更难。所有儿童(包括成绩差的儿童和拼写有障碍的儿童)都证实了这一效果。听写拼写和自发拼写之间的中度相关性表明,这两项任务由部分不同的拼写过程支持,并证实了在学校同时进行这两种拼写评估的建议。在研究2中,儿童在两项任务(即听写或自发拼写文本)中的拼写表现并不相关。两项任务的难度水平相同,但一项任务的表现并不能预测另一项任务的表现。在文本层面发现儿童之间存在很大的个体差异,这是任务的一个函数。与研究1类似,听写文本拼写和自发拼写之间的中度相关性证实了在学校采用这两种拼写评估的有用性。