UCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Ireland.
UCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Ireland.
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183(Pt 3):826-835. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.035. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
The potential environmental impact of wasted food minimisation versus its utilisation in a circular bioeconomy is investigated based on a case study of Ireland. The amount of wasted food and food residue (WFFR) produced in 2010 was used for business-as-usual, (a) and four management options were assessed, (b) minimisation, (c) composting, (d) anaerobic digestion and (e) incineration. The environmental impacts Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP) and Eutrophication Potential (EP) were considered. A carbon return on investment (CRoI) was calculated for the three processing technologies (c-e). The results showed that a minimisation strategy for wasted food would result in the greatest reduction of all three impacts, -4.5 Mt CO-e (GWP), -11.4 kt PO-e (EP) and -43.9 kt SO-e (AP) compared to business as usual. For WFFR utilisation in the circular bioeconomy, anaerobic digestion resulted in the lowest environmental impact and best CRoI of -0.84 kg CO-e per Euro. From an economic perspective, for minimisation to be beneficial, 0.15 kg of wasted food would need to be reduced per Euro spent.
基于爱尔兰的案例研究,调查了减少浪费食物与在循环生物经济中利用浪费食物之间的潜在环境影响。使用 2010 年产生的废弃食物和食物残渣(WFFR)进行了常规业务(a),并评估了四种管理选项(b),即最小化,(c)堆肥,(d)厌氧消化和(e)焚烧。考虑了全球变暖潜力(GWP)、酸化潜力(AP)和富营养化潜力(EP)的环境影响。为三种处理技术(c-e)计算了投资碳回报率(CRoI)。结果表明,与常规业务相比,浪费食物的最小化策略将导致所有三种影响的最大减少,-4.5 Mt CO-e(GWP),-11.4 kt PO-e(EP)和-43.9 kt SO-e(AP)。对于循环生物经济中利用 WFFR,厌氧消化导致的环境影响最小,投资碳回报率为-0.84 公斤 CO-e/欧元。从经济角度来看,为了使最小化受益,每花费一欧元就需要减少 0.15 公斤的浪费食物。