Gibbon Victoria E, Porter Tarun A, Wu Xiujie, Liu Wu
Department of Anthropology, University of New Brunswick, 13 MacAulay Lane, Annex C, Suite 28, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada; Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Department of Anthropology, University of New Brunswick, 13 MacAulay Lane, Annex C, Suite 28, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada.
Homo. 2016 Oct;67(5):369-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
In this paper, population continuity and discontinuity in northern China are explored using craniometric analyses from two archaeological sites, Longxian (Warring States) and Qi Li Cun (Han Dynasty). Neither population has been previously studied. Artefactual evidence shows the individuals from Qi Li Cun were Xianbei, descendants from Mongolia. Longxian is from further south in the central plains at an earlier time, thus, we expect to observe variability between these groups. In total, 24 cranial measurements were obtained on 66 crania from these sites. Howells's cranial measurements on Anyang (42 crania) and Hainan (83 crania) Chinese samples were included for comparative purposes. Less variability is expected between Longxian and Howells's Chinese data due to geographic and temporal similarity. With closer geographic and temporal affinity with Anyang, the expectation is for Longxian and Anyang to be similar. Few statistical differences exist between Longxian and Qi Li Cun; this was supported by the similarity found through principal components analysis (PCA). Regardless of sex, canonical discriminant analysis shows clustering of Longxian and Qi Li Cun separate from those of Anyang and Hainan. Their similarity indicates the people from Longxian and Qi Li Cun likely share Mongolian ancestry. Our results, supported by other studies, suggest that despite temporal differences, Mongolians living in China during the Warring States and Han dynasty retained their cultural and genetic Mongolian identity. These data add valuable bioarchaeological information regarding the peopling of northern China during a crucial period of cultural and political change in the Early Bronze Age and Iron Age.
在本文中,我们利用来自两个考古遗址——陇县(战国时期)和七里村(汉代)的颅骨测量分析,探讨了中国北方人口的连续性和间断性。此前尚未对这两个人口群体进行过研究。器物证据表明,七里村的个体是鲜卑人,即蒙古人的后裔。陇县的个体来自更早时期中原地区更靠南的地方,因此,我们预计会观察到这两个群体之间的差异。总共对来自这些遗址的66具颅骨进行了24项颅骨测量。为了进行比较,还纳入了豪厄尔斯对安阳(42具颅骨)和海南(83具颅骨)中国样本的颅骨测量数据。由于地理和时间上的相似性,预计陇县与豪厄尔斯的中国数据之间的差异较小。由于与安阳在地理和时间上的亲缘关系更近,预计陇县和安阳会相似。陇县和七里村之间几乎没有统计差异;主成分分析(PCA)发现的相似性支持了这一点。无论性别如何,典型判别分析表明,陇县和七里村的样本聚类与安阳和海南的样本不同。它们的相似性表明,陇县和七里村的人可能有共同的蒙古血统。我们的结果得到了其他研究的支持,表明尽管存在时间差异,但战国时期和汉代生活在中国的蒙古人保留了他们的蒙古文化和基因特征。这些数据为青铜时代早期和铁器时代文化和政治变革关键时期中国北方的人口迁移提供了宝贵的生物考古学信息。