Spencer Simon, Wolf Alex, Rushton Alison
The English Institute of Sport, The Manchester Institute of Health and Performance, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, Charing Cross Hospital, United Kingdom.
J Athl Train. 2016 Aug;51(8):613-628. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.10.03. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
Identification of strategies to prevent spinal injury, optimize rehabilitation, and enhance performance is a priority for practitioners. Different exercises produce different effects on neuromuscular performance. Clarity of the purpose of a prescribed exercise is central to a successful outcome. Spinal exercises need to be classified according to the objective of the exercise and planned physical outcome.
To define the modifiable spinal abilities that underpin optimal function during skilled athletic performance, clarify the effect of spinal pain and pathologic conditions, and classify spinal exercises according to the objective of the exercise and intended physical outcomes to inform training and rehabilitation.
Qualitative study.
We conducted a qualitative consensus method of 4 iterative phases. An exploratory panel carried out an extended review of the English-language literature using CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed to identify key themes and subthemes to inform the definitions of exercise categories, physical abilities, and physical outcomes. An expert project group reviewed panel findings. A draft classification was discussed with physiotherapists (n = 49) and international experts. Lead physiotherapy and strength and conditioning teams (n = 17) reviewed a revised classification. Consensus was defined as unanimous agreement.
After the literature review and subsequent analysis, we defined spinal abilities in 4 categories: mobility, motor control, work capacity, and strength. Exercises were subclassified by functionality as nonfunctional or functional and by spinal displacement as either static (neutral spinal posture with no segmental displacement) or dynamic (dynamic segmental movement). The proposed terminology and classification support commonality of language for practitioners.
The spinal-exercise classification will support clinical reasoning through a framework of spinal-exercise objectives that clearly define the nature of the exercise prescription required to deliver intended physical outcomes.
确定预防脊柱损伤、优化康复和提高运动表现的策略是从业者的首要任务。不同的锻炼对神经肌肉表现会产生不同的影响。明确规定锻炼的目的是取得成功结果的关键。脊柱锻炼需要根据锻炼的目标和预期的身体结果进行分类。
确定在熟练的运动表现中支撑最佳功能的可改变的脊柱能力,阐明脊柱疼痛和病理状况的影响,并根据锻炼的目标和预期的身体结果对脊柱锻炼进行分类,以为训练和康复提供依据。
定性研究。
我们采用了4个迭代阶段的定性共识方法。一个探索性小组使用CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE和PubMed对英文文献进行了广泛回顾,以确定关键主题和子主题,为锻炼类别、身体能力和身体结果的定义提供信息。一个专家项目小组审查了小组的研究结果。与物理治疗师(n = 49)和国际专家讨论了一份分类草案。物理治疗和力量与体能训练的主要团队(n = 17)审查了一份修订后的分类。共识被定义为一致同意。
经过文献回顾和后续分析,我们将脊柱能力分为4类:活动度、运动控制、工作能力和力量。锻炼根据功能被细分为非功能性或功能性,根据脊柱位移被分为静态(脊柱中立位姿势,无节段性位移)或动态(动态节段性运动)。所提出的术语和分类为从业者提供了共同的语言支持。
脊柱锻炼分类将通过一个脊柱锻炼目标框架支持临床推理该框架明确界定了实现预期身体结果所需的锻炼处方的性质。