Suppr超能文献

下背痛稳定训练的最新进展:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

An update of stabilisation exercises for low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

作者信息

Smith Benjamin E, Littlewood Chris, May Stephen

机构信息

Physiotherapy Outpatients, London Road Community Hospital, Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London Road, Derby DE1 2QY, UK.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec 9;15:416. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-416.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a large and costly problem. It has a lifetime prevalence of 80% and results in high levels of healthcare cost. It is a major cause for long term sickness amongst the workforce and is associated with high levels of fear avoidance and kinesiophobia. Stabilisation (or 'core stability') exercises have been suggested to reduce symptoms of pain and disability and form an effective treatment. Despite it being the most commonly used form of physiotherapy treatment within the UK there is a lack of positive evidence to support its use. The aims of this systematic review update is to investigate the effectiveness of stabilisation exercises for the treatment of NSLBP, and compare any effectiveness to other forms of exercise.

METHODS

A systematic review published in 2008 was updated with a search of PubMed, CINAHL, AMED, Pedro and The Cochrane Library, October 2006 to October 2013. Two authors independently selected studies, and two authors independently extracted the data. Methodological quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis was carried out when appropriate.

RESULTS

29 studies were included: 22 studies (n = 2,258) provided post treatment effect on pain and 24 studies (n = 2,359) provided post treatment effect on disability. Pain and disability scores were transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Meta-analysis showed significant benefit for stabilisation exercises versus any alternative treatment or control for long term pain and disability with mean difference of -6.39 (95% CI -10.14 to -2.65) and -3.92 (95% CI -7.25 to -0.59) respectively. The difference between groups was clinically insignificant. When compared with alternative forms of exercise, there was no statistical or clinically significant difference. Mean difference for pain was -3.06 (95% CI -6.74 to 0.63) and disability -1.89 (95% CI -5.10 to 1.33).

CONCLUSION

There is strong evidence stabilisation exercises are not more effective than any other form of active exercise in the long term. The low levels of heterogeneity and large number of high methodological quality of available studies, at long term follow-up, strengthen our current findings, and further research is unlikely to considerably alter this conclusion.

摘要

背景

非特异性下腰痛(NSLBP)是一个规模庞大且成本高昂的问题。其终生患病率为80%,导致了高昂的医疗成本。它是劳动力长期患病的主要原因,且与高度的恐惧回避和运动恐惧症相关。稳定化(或“核心稳定性”)训练被认为可以减轻疼痛和残疾症状,是一种有效的治疗方法。尽管它是英国最常用的物理治疗形式,但缺乏支持其使用的积极证据。本系统评价更新的目的是研究稳定化训练治疗NSLBP的有效性,并将其有效性与其他形式的运动进行比较。

方法

对2008年发表的一篇系统评价进行更新,检索了2006年10月至2013年10月的PubMed、CINAHL、AMED、Pedro和Cochrane图书馆。两位作者独立选择研究,两位作者独立提取数据。采用PEDro量表评估方法学质量。在适当情况下进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入29项研究:22项研究(n = 2258)提供了治疗后疼痛效果,24项研究(n = 2359)提供了治疗后残疾效果。疼痛和残疾评分转换为0至100分制。荟萃分析显示,与任何替代治疗或对照相比,稳定化训练对长期疼痛和残疾有显著益处,平均差异分别为-6.39(95%CI -10.14至-2.65)和-3.92(95%CI -7.25至-0.59)。组间差异在临床上不显著。与其他形式的运动相比,没有统计学或临床显著差异。疼痛的平均差异为-3.06(95%CI -6.74至0.63),残疾的平均差异为-1.89(95%CI -5.10至1.33)。

结论

有强有力的证据表明,从长期来看,稳定化训练并不比任何其他形式的主动运动更有效。现有研究在长期随访中异质性水平较低且方法学质量较高,这强化了我们目前的研究结果,进一步的研究不太可能显著改变这一结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb40/4295260/5a36e8ff766a/12891_2014_Article_2354_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验