Yang Wook Tae, Wang Il Jae, Cho Suck Ju, Yeom Seok-Ran, Park Sung-Wook, Tae Won Ung, Goh Tae Sik, Huh Up, Ryu Dongman, Song Chanhee, Cho Young Mo
Department of Emergency Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0327321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327321. eCollection 2025.
Timely and accurate initial assessment of trauma patients can significantly affect future outcomes. This study aimed to compare the predictive value of the lactate level and base deficit for traumatic coagulopathy, in-hospital mortality, and massive transfusion. This retrospective, observational, single-center study included patients who visited a trauma center from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcome was traumatic coagulopathy, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and massive transfusion. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether the lactate level and base deficit were independent risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to assess the predictive value of lactate and base deficit. In total, 4,379 patients were included in the study. In the logistic regression analysis, base deficit was identified as an independent risk factor for traumatic coagulopathy, whereas lactate was not. Regarding in-hospital mortality, the lactate level was an independent risk factor, whereas base deficit was not. The area under the curve values for predicting traumatic coagulopathy using lactate levels and base deficit were 0.710 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.696-0.723) and 0.756 (95% CI, 0.743-0.769), respectively; this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001; 95% CI, 0.030-0.0622). Base deficit excelled in traumatic coagulopathy prediction, whereas lactate levels prevailed in mortality prediction. Both markers warrant careful observation in the assessment and management of patients with trauma.
及时、准确地对创伤患者进行初始评估可显著影响其未来预后。本研究旨在比较乳酸水平和碱剩余对创伤性凝血病、院内死亡率及大量输血的预测价值。这项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究纳入了2016年至2020年期间就诊于一家创伤中心的患者。主要结局为创伤性凝血病,次要结局为院内死亡率和大量输血。进行逻辑回归分析以确定乳酸水平和碱剩余是否为独立危险因素。计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积以评估乳酸和碱剩余的预测价值。本研究共纳入4379例患者。在逻辑回归分析中,碱剩余被确定为创伤性凝血病的独立危险因素,而乳酸不是。关于院内死亡率,乳酸水平是独立危险因素,而碱剩余不是。使用乳酸水平和碱剩余预测创伤性凝血病的曲线下面积值分别为0.710(95%置信区间[CI],0.696 - 0.723)和0.756(95%CI,0.743 - 0.769);这一差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001;95%CI,0.030 - 0.0622)。碱剩余在创伤性凝血病预测方面表现出色,而乳酸水平在死亡率预测方面更具优势。在创伤患者的评估和管理中,这两种指标都值得密切观察。