• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推进多发伤救治:开发和验证用于早期死亡率预测的机器学习模型。

Advancing polytrauma care: developing and validating machine learning models for early mortality prediction.

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Center, Quzhou People's Hospital, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, No. 100, Minjiang Avenue, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Quzhou People's Hospital, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, No. 100, Minjiang Avenue, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

J Transl Med. 2023 Sep 25;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04487-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12967-023-04487-8
PMID:37743498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10518974/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rapid identification of high-risk polytrauma patients is crucial for early intervention and improved outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for predicting 72 h mortality in adult polytrauma patients using readily available clinical parameters.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on polytrauma patients from the Dryad database and our institution. Missing values pertinent to eligible individuals within the Dryad database were compensated for through the k-nearest neighbor algorithm, subsequently randomizing them into training and internal validation factions on a 7:3 ratio. The patients of our institution functioned as external validation cohorts. The predictive efficacy of random forest (RF), neural network, and XGBoost models was assessed through an exhaustive suite of performance indicators. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) methods were engaged to explain the supreme-performing model. Conclusively, restricted cubic spline analysis and multivariate logistic regression were employed as sensitivity analyses to verify the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

Parameters including age, body mass index, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, pH, base excess, and lactate emerged as pivotal predictors of 72 h mortality. The RF model exhibited unparalleled performance, boasting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.89), an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.67 (95% CI 0.61-0.73), and an accuracy of 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.86) in the internal validation cohort, paralleled by an AUROC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99), an AUPRC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93), and an accuracy of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.98) in the external validation cohort. It provided the highest net benefit in the decision curve analysis in relation to the other models. The outcomes of the sensitivity examinations were congruent with those inferred from SHAP and LIME.

CONCLUSIONS

The RF model exhibited the best performance in predicting 72 h mortality in adult polytrauma patients and has the potential to aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and guiding clinical decision-making.

摘要

背景

快速识别高危多发伤患者对于早期干预和改善预后至关重要。本研究旨在开发和验证使用易于获得的临床参数预测成年多发伤患者 72 小时死亡率的机器学习模型。

方法

对 Dryad 数据库和我们机构的多发伤患者进行回顾性分析。通过 K-最近邻算法补偿与 Dryad 数据库中合格个体相关的缺失值,随后将其随机分为 7:3 的训练和内部验证组。我们机构的患者作为外部验证队列。通过一整套性能指标评估随机森林 (RF)、神经网络和 XGBoost 模型的预测效果。采用 SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) 和 Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) 方法解释表现最佳的模型。最后,进行限制性立方样条分析和多变量逻辑回归作为敏感性分析,以验证结果的稳健性。

结果

包括年龄、体重指数、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、损伤严重程度评分、pH 值、碱剩余和乳酸在内的参数被确定为 72 小时死亡率的关键预测因素。RF 模型表现卓越,在内部验证队列中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积 (AUROC) 为 0.87(95%置信区间[CI]0.84-0.89),精度-召回曲线下面积 (AUPRC) 为 0.67(95%CI0.61-0.73),准确率为 0.83(95%CI0.81-0.86),外部验证队列中的 AUROC 为 0.98(95%CI0.97-0.99),AUPRC 为 0.88(95%CI0.83-0.93),准确率为 0.97(95%CI0.96-0.98)。在决策曲线分析中,它与其他模型相比提供了最高的净收益。敏感性检查的结果与 SHAP 和 LIME 推断的结果一致。

结论

RF 模型在预测成年多发伤患者 72 小时死亡率方面表现最佳,具有帮助临床医生识别高危患者和指导临床决策的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/f506916240fc/12967_2023_4487_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/0b5272764dce/12967_2023_4487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/f9ae0c73cf7b/12967_2023_4487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/6a3fa92c3ffa/12967_2023_4487_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/d7cb92adc56b/12967_2023_4487_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/36c4e489587d/12967_2023_4487_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/8b7a8bd733ce/12967_2023_4487_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/f506916240fc/12967_2023_4487_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/0b5272764dce/12967_2023_4487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/f9ae0c73cf7b/12967_2023_4487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/6a3fa92c3ffa/12967_2023_4487_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/d7cb92adc56b/12967_2023_4487_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/36c4e489587d/12967_2023_4487_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/8b7a8bd733ce/12967_2023_4487_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e4/10518974/f506916240fc/12967_2023_4487_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Advancing polytrauma care: developing and validating machine learning models for early mortality prediction.推进多发伤救治:开发和验证用于早期死亡率预测的机器学习模型。
J Transl Med. 2023 Sep 25;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04487-8.
2
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.
3
Predicting cerebral edema in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using machine learning.使用机器学习预测自发性脑出血患者的脑水肿
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 3;15:1419608. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1419608. eCollection 2024.
4
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
5
Clinical decision support systems for 3-month mortality in elderly patients admitted to ICU with ischemic stroke using interpretable machine learning.使用可解释机器学习的针对入住重症监护病房的老年缺血性中风患者3个月死亡率的临床决策支持系统
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 17;10:20552076241280126. doi: 10.1177/20552076241280126. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: Model Development and Validation Study.基于机器学习的小儿心脏手术后急性肾损伤预测:模型开发与验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 5;25:e41142. doi: 10.2196/41142.
7
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
8
Development and internal validation of machine learning models for personalized survival predictions in spinal cord glioma patients.机器学习模型在脊髓神经胶质瘤患者个体化生存预测中的开发和内部验证。
Spine J. 2024 Jun;24(6):1065-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.02.002. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
Predicting the complexity and mortality of polytrauma patients with machine learning models.运用机器学习模型预测多发伤患者的复杂性和死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 9;14(1):8302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58830-0.
10
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated liver injury.用于预测脓毒症相关性肝损伤患者 28 天死亡率的可解释机器学习模型。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303469. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and external validation of a machine learning model for cardiac valve calcification early screening in dialysis patients: a multicenter study.用于透析患者心脏瓣膜钙化早期筛查的机器学习模型的开发与外部验证:一项多中心研究
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2491656. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2491656. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Follicular Lymphoma-Grade 3: A Study Based on the SEER Database.滤泡性淋巴瘤3级的生存结果及预后因素:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
Sci Prog. 2025 Apr-Jun;108(2):368504251335082. doi: 10.1177/00368504251335082. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
3
Elucidating the Mechanism of VVTT Infection Through Machine Learning and Transcriptome Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of patient's neurological recovery from cervical spinal cord injury through XGBoost learning approach.通过 XGBoost 学习方法预测颈椎脊髓损伤患者的神经恢复情况。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):2140-2148. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07712-6. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
2
Interpretable AI for bio-medical applications.用于生物医学应用的可解释人工智能。
Complex Eng Syst. 2022 Dec;2(4). doi: 10.20517/ces.2022.41. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Clinical Medicine, 2023.临床医学中的人工智能与机器学习,2023年。
通过机器学习和转录组分析阐明VVTT感染的机制。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jan 30;26(3):1203. doi: 10.3390/ijms26031203.
4
Predicting cerebral edema in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using machine learning.使用机器学习预测自发性脑出血患者的脑水肿
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 3;15:1419608. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1419608. eCollection 2024.
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1201-1208. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2302038.
4
Risks in the Management of Polytrauma Patients: Clinical Insights.多发伤患者管理中的风险:临床见解
Orthop Res Rev. 2023 Mar 21;15:27-38. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S340532. eCollection 2023.
5
Interest of the MGAP score on in-hospital trauma patients: Comparison with TRISS, ISS and NISS scores.MGAP 评分对住院创伤患者的意义:与 TRISS、ISS 和 NISS 评分的比较。
Injury. 2022 Sep;53(9):3059-3064. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.024. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
Pathophysiology in patients with polytrauma.多发伤患者的病理生理学。
Injury. 2022 Jul;53(7):2400-2412. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
Toward the explainability, transparency, and universality of machine learning for behavioral classification in neuroscience.迈向神经科学行为分类机器学习的可解释性、透明性和通用性。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2022 Apr;73:102544. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2022.102544. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
8
Machine learning and conventional statistics: making sense of the differences.机器学习和传统统计学:理解差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):753-757. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06896-6. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
9
Physiologic Scoring Systems versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.生理评分系统与格拉斯哥昏迷量表在预测创伤患者院内死亡率中的比较:一项诊断准确性研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 23;9(1):e64. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1376. eCollection 2021.
10
Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making.利用人工智能进行临床决策。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Jun 25;3:645232. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.645232. eCollection 2021.