Sosdian L, Hinman R S, Wrigley T V, Paterson K L, Dowsey M, Choong P, Bennell K
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016 Nov;39:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
BACKGROUND: Varus-valgus thrust is a biomechanical characteristic linked to knee osteoarthritis disease progression. This study aimed to determine: i) direction of thrust in individuals awaiting total knee arthroplasty versus controls, ii) whether thrust and related parameters differed between groups, iii) differences between osteoarthritis patients awaiting surgery with varus and valgus thrust. METHODS: 44 patients scheduled for surgery and 40 asymptomatic participants were recruited. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: varus-valgus thrust excursion and absolute thrust magnitude, quantified by 3D gait analysis. FINDINGS: Few differences were found between the osteoarthritis group and controls. The osteoarthritis group as a whole had a more varus knee angle during early- (p<0.0001) and mid-stance (p=0.010) versus controls. The varus thrust osteoarthritis subgroup had a more varus knee angle in overall (p=0.012), early- (p<0.001), and mid- (p<0.001) stance, and a higher peak knee adduction moment (p=0.019) and impulse (p=0.001) when compared to varus thrust controls. No differences were found between the valgus thrust osteoarthritis and control groups. The varus thrust osteoarthritis group had a greater varus peak knee angle in overall (p<0.001), early- (p<0.001), and mid- (p<0.001) stance, higher peak knee adduction moment (p<0.001) and impulse (p=0.001), more varus static alignment (p=0.014), and lower quadriceps strength (p=0.035) than the valgus thrust osteoarthritis group. INTERPRETATION: Those with severe osteoarthritis and a varus thrust have poorer biomechanics, more varus static knee alignment, and lower quadriceps strength compared to those with osteoarthritis with a valgus thrust. Further work is needed to determine if these findings impact total knee arthroplasty outcome.
背景:内翻-外翻推力是一种与膝关节骨关节炎疾病进展相关的生物力学特征。本研究旨在确定:i)等待全膝关节置换术的个体与对照组的推力方向;ii)两组之间的推力及相关参数是否存在差异;iii)内翻推力和外翻推力的骨关节炎患者在等待手术时的差异。 方法:招募了44名计划进行手术的患者和40名无症状参与者。 主要观察指标:通过3D步态分析量化的内翻-外翻推力偏移和绝对推力大小。 研究结果:骨关节炎组与对照组之间几乎没有差异。与对照组相比,骨关节炎组在早期(p<0.0001)和中期站立(p=0.010)时整体膝关节角度更偏向内翻。与内翻推力对照组相比,内翻推力骨关节炎亚组在整体(p=0.012)、早期(p<0.001)和中期(p<0.001)站立时膝关节角度更偏向内翻,并且膝关节内收力矩峰值(p=0.019)和冲量(p=0.001)更高。外翻推力骨关节炎组与对照组之间未发现差异。与外翻推力骨关节炎组相比,内翻推力骨关节炎组在整体(p<0.001)、早期(p<0.001)和中期(p<0.001)站立时膝关节内翻峰值角度更大,膝关节内收力矩峰值(p<0.001)和冲量(p=0.001)更高,静态内翻对线更多(p=0.014),股四头肌力量更低(p=0.035)。 解读:与外翻推力的骨关节炎患者相比,严重骨关节炎和内翻推力患者的生物力学更差,静态膝关节内翻对线更多,股四头肌力量更低。需要进一步研究以确定这些发现是否会影响全膝关节置换术的结果。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016-11
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016-11
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017-11
Arthritis Rheum. 2004-12
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2025-2
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020-12