Sucić M, Kolevska T, Kopjar B, Kosanović M, Drobnjak M, Zalud I, Marusić M
Department of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics, Zagreb University School of Medicine, Croatia, Yugoslavia.
Cytometry. 1989 Jul;10(4):442-7. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990100412.
A double-blind study was performed with peripheral blood of 41 human subjects to check the accuracy of determination of lymphocyte, monocyte, and granulocyte windows with which every flow cytometric analysis of leukocyte markers starts. White blood cell suspensions were prepared according to the whole blood method and analyzed on an EPICS-C flow cytometer using the two-parameter 90 degrees light scatter vs. forward angle light scatter (granularity vs. cell size) data distribution. Windows (bitmaps) for lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes were drawn and numbers of cells determined in each. The proportions of lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes were calculated in relation to total cell number, counted and in relation to the sum of cells in three bitmaps, and then compared with proportions determined by microscopic whole blood cell (WBC) differential and a WBC differential determined in an automated hematology analyzer. Average proportions of lymphocytes obtained by the flow cytometer were significantly lower than those obtained by either microscopic or automated differential, suggesting that some of the relevant cells were not included in the bitmaps. Granulocyte proportion related to total cell number was lower and that related to bitmap cell number higher than that obtained by microscopic and automatic differentials, suggesting that nongranulocytic cells were included in the granulocyte bitmaps. Proportions of lymphocytes and granulocytes obtained by the flow cytometer correlated well with those obtained by both microscopic and automatic differential. In contrast, the proportions of monocytes showed a poor correlation, which is probably due to their low number and delicate position in the distribution, and which makes them difficult to delineate.
对41名人类受试者的外周血进行了一项双盲研究,以检查白细胞标志物流式细胞术分析开始时淋巴细胞、单核细胞和粒细胞窗口测定的准确性。根据全血方法制备白细胞悬液,并使用双参数90度光散射与前向角光散射(颗粒度与细胞大小)数据分布在EPICS-C流式细胞仪上进行分析。绘制淋巴细胞、单核细胞和粒细胞的窗口(位图),并确定每个窗口中的细胞数量。计算淋巴细胞、单核细胞和粒细胞相对于总细胞数(计数得到)以及相对于三个位图中细胞总和的比例,然后与显微镜下全血细胞(WBC)分类计数和自动血液分析仪中确定的WBC分类计数所得到的比例进行比较。流式细胞仪获得的淋巴细胞平均比例显著低于显微镜或自动分类计数所得到的比例,这表明一些相关细胞未包含在位图中。与总细胞数相关的粒细胞比例低于显微镜和自动分类计数所得到的比例,而与位图细胞数相关的粒细胞比例则高于显微镜和自动分类计数所得到的比例,这表明粒细胞位图中包含了非粒细胞。流式细胞仪获得的淋巴细胞和粒细胞比例与显微镜和自动分类计数所得到的比例相关性良好。相比之下,单核细胞的比例相关性较差,这可能是由于其数量较少且在分布中的位置微妙,使其难以界定。