Reczek Corinne, Umberson Debra
Department of Sociology, Ohio State University, 164 Townshend Hall, 1885 Neil Avenue Mall, Columbus, OH 43210 (
J Marriage Fam. 2016 Aug;78(4):957-974. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12318. Epub 2016 May 27.
It is well established that married heterosexual women do more intergenerational caregiving for aging parents and parents-in-law than married heterosexual men do. However, gay men and lesbian women's recent access to marriage presents new questions about the gendered marital dynamics of intergenerational caregiving. We use dyadic data with gay, lesbian, and heterosexual spouses to examine the marital dynamics of intergenerational caregivers. Results show that gay and lesbian spouses provided intensive time and emotional support for an intergenerational caregiver. In contrast, heterosexual women described their intergenerational caregiving as rarely supported and at times even undermined by their spouse. Dyadic data on heterosexual men corroborate women's accounts; heterosexual men rarely reported providing intergenerational caregiving, and thus heterosexual women rarely described providing spousal support. These findings provide new insight into the intermingled roles of "greedy" marriages and "needy" parents, wherein marital negotiations around caregiving vary by gender for gay, lesbian, and heterosexual marital dyads.
众所周知,已婚异性恋女性比已婚异性恋男性更多地为年迈的父母和公婆提供代际照料。然而,男同性恋者和女同性恋者最近能够结婚,这就代际照料中的性别化婚姻动态提出了新问题。我们使用男同性恋、女同性恋和异性恋配偶的二元数据来研究代际照料者的婚姻动态。结果表明,男同性恋和女同性恋配偶为代际照料者提供了大量的时间和情感支持。相比之下,异性恋女性表示她们的代际照料很少得到配偶的支持,有时甚至受到配偶的破坏。关于异性恋男性的二元数据证实了女性的说法;异性恋男性很少报告提供代际照料,因此异性恋女性也很少描述提供配偶支持。这些发现为“贪婪”婚姻和“需要帮助”的父母的交织角色提供了新的见解,其中围绕照料的婚姻谈判因男同性恋、女同性恋和异性恋婚姻二元组的性别而异。