Chan Tabitha Y, Tan Poh Wee, Tang Johann I
Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore.
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Sep 9;9:5577-86. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S108559. eCollection 2016.
Proton-beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer has been in used for several decades, with its technique evolving significantly over this period. A growing number of centers now routinely utilize pencil-beam scanning as an advanced technique of PBT. Interest and controversy concerning its use have recently come under scrutiny. While the past decade has produced an assemblage of evidence suggesting that PBT is safe and effective for early stage prostate cancer, it is still unknown whether the theoretical dosimetric advantages of PBT translate into meaningful clinical improvements over routine intensity-modulated radiation therapy, which is commonly used for these patients. Outcomes from early trials using whole courses of PBT have shown mixed results when compared with routine intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Therefore, randomized trials comparing these two techniques should be undertaken, as this would help in defining the role of PBT for this patient group. This article aims to describe the basics of PBT, review the reasons for the growing interest in PBT, review the evidence for PBT, review the controversy surrounding PBT, and inquire about PBT's future in the treatment of prostate cancer, with attention to its physical properties, comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness, and advances in its delivery.
质子束疗法(PBT)用于前列腺癌治疗已有数十年,在此期间其技术有了显著发展。现在越来越多的中心常规使用笔形束扫描作为PBT的一项先进技术。最近,关于其应用的兴趣和争议受到了审视。虽然过去十年已有大量证据表明PBT对早期前列腺癌是安全有效的,但PBT在剂量学上的理论优势是否能转化为相较于常规调强放射治疗(常用于这些患者)的有意义的临床改善仍不明确。与常规调强放射治疗相比,早期使用全程PBT的试验结果喜忧参半。因此,应该开展比较这两种技术的随机试验,因为这将有助于明确PBT在该患者群体中的作用。本文旨在描述PBT的基础知识,回顾对PBT兴趣日增的原因,审视PBT的证据,回顾围绕PBT的争议,并探讨PBT在前列腺癌治疗中的未来,同时关注其物理特性、临床比较和成本效益以及其治疗方式的进展。