Trim Cynthia M, Hofmeister Erik H, Quandt Jane E, Shepard Molly K
Departments of Large Animal Medicine (Trim, Shepard) and Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2017 Jan;27(1):89-95. doi: 10.1111/vec.12543. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
To describe the clinical practice of insertion of arterial catheters in anesthetized dogs and cats, to document complications of arterial catheterization, and to determine risk factors associated with the complications.
Prospective clinical study and retrospective evaluation of medical records.
University teaching hospital.
Dogs (n = 251) and 13 cats anesthetized for clinical procedures with arterial catheters inserted for blood pressure monitoring.
None.
Details of the animal and catheter were collected at the time of anesthesia. On the following day, the catheter site was palpated and observed for abnormalities and the medical records of all animals were reviewed retrospectively for complications. Details of catheter placement were available for 216 catheters: 158 catheters in a dorsal pedal artery, 50 catheters in the median caudal (coccygeal) artery, 6 in the median artery, and 1 each in a cranial tibial and lingual artery. Blood pressure was obtained from 200 catheters, and 12 catheters failed before the end of anesthesia. Postoperative observational data obtained from 112 catheters described a palpable arterial pulse at 73 sites and no pulse at 21 sites. No risk factor for arterial occlusion was identified. No complications resulting from arterial catheterization were noted in the medical records.
Arterial catheterization resulted in loss of a peripheral pulse postoperatively in 21/94 (22.3%) of animals examined, although no evidence of tissue ischemia was noted in the medical records of any of the patients in this study. These results suggest that insertion of a catheter in the dorsal pedal or coccygeal arteries was not associated with a high risk for complications. However, the course of arterial occlusion postoperatively warrants further investigation.
描述在麻醉犬猫中插入动脉导管的临床操作,记录动脉导管插入术的并发症,并确定与并发症相关的危险因素。
前瞻性临床研究和病历回顾性评估。
大学教学医院。
因临床手术接受麻醉并插入动脉导管以监测血压的犬(n = 251)和13只猫。
无。
在麻醉时收集动物和导管的详细信息。次日,触诊导管部位并观察有无异常,并回顾所有动物的病历以查找并发症。有216根导管的放置细节可供参考:158根导管置于足背动脉,50根导管置于尾中(尾骨)动脉,6根导管置于正中动脉以及各1根导管分别置于胫前动脉和舌动脉。从200根导管获取了血压数据,12根导管在麻醉结束前失效。从112根导管获得的术后观察数据显示,73个部位可触及动脉搏动,21个部位未触及。未发现动脉闭塞的危险因素。病历中未记录动脉导管插入术导致的并发症。
尽管本研究中任何患者的病历中均未发现组织缺血的证据,但动脉导管插入术导致术后21/94(22.3%)接受检查的动物出现外周脉搏消失。这些结果表明,在足背动脉或尾骨动脉插入导管与高并发症风险无关。然而,术后动脉闭塞的过程值得进一步研究。