Carpenter A B, Smailer S
St. Margaret Memorial Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
Immunol Invest. 1989 Jul;18(6):765-73. doi: 10.3109/08820138909030597.
In this study we assessed the clinical utility of measuring all major rheumatoid factor (RF) isotypes (IgG, IgA, and IgM) in the diagnostic immunology laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). An improved method for IgG-RF was tested which employed a commercially available monoclonal anti-human IgG Fd antibody and did not require pepsin digestion of samples. We detected elevated levels of all three RF isotypes in a population of hospitalized rheumatoid arthritis patients (n = 109). We demonstrated a significant association between IgM and IgA RF which occurred in 36% of our subjects, while less than 6% had IgM + IgG RF or IgG + IgA RF. A comparison of the IgM ELISA with the Rheumaton revealed a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.65, p = 0.001). In addition, the two methodologies were equivalent in sensitivity (ELISA: 76%, Rheumaton: 78%). However, the ELISA procedure was more time consuming, costly, and required greater technical expertise. The following clinical and laboratory findings were significantly associated with RF isotypes: IgG RF and the presence of rheumatoid nodules (p = 0.03), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and IgG RF (p = 0.007), and elevated ESR and IgM RF (p = 0.0009). Our ELISA methodology did not provide significant advantages over existing techniques to justify its use as part of the routine laboratory assessment of rheumatoid factor.
在本研究中,我们在诊断免疫学实验室使用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)评估了检测所有主要类风湿因子(RF)同种型(IgG、IgA和IgM)的临床效用。测试了一种改进的IgG-RF检测方法,该方法使用市售的抗人IgG Fd单克隆抗体,且无需对样品进行胃蛋白酶消化。我们在一组住院类风湿关节炎患者(n = 109)中检测到所有三种RF同种型水平升高。我们证明了IgM和IgA RF之间存在显著关联,在我们的研究对象中有36%出现这种情况,而只有不到6%的患者同时存在IgM + IgG RF或IgG + IgA RF。将IgM ELISA与Rheumaton进行比较,发现具有统计学显著相关性(r = 0.65,p = 0.001)。此外,两种方法在敏感性方面相当(ELISA:76%,Rheumaton:78%)。然而,ELISA操作更耗时、成本更高,且需要更高的技术专业知识。以下临床和实验室检查结果与RF同种型显著相关:IgG RF与类风湿结节的存在(p = 0.03)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)升高与IgG RF(p = 0.007)以及ESR升高与IgM RF(p = 0.0009)。我们的ELISA方法相较于现有技术没有显著优势,不足以证明其可作为类风湿因子常规实验室评估的一部分。