Suppr超能文献

吊带手术后的肉芽肿:试图回答“为什么”以及“接下来该怎么做”。

Granuloma after sling surgery: an attempt to answer the 'why' and 'what to do next'.

作者信息

Mehta Anuj, Naik Mayuresh, Abrol Sangeeta, Garg Prerna, Joshi Mukesh

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, V.M.M.C and Safdarjung Hospital, Room No. 430 of Eye OPD, 4th floor of OPD building, Ansari Nagar, Ring Road, New Delhi, 110029, India.

Department of Ophthalmology, P.G.I.M.E.R and R.M.L Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;37(4):973-977. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0342-0. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To review cases of granuloma formation after sling surgery with a view to find out possible aetiological factors and propose a further plan of management MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 120 eyes of 108 patients who underwent frontalis sling surgery with silicone rod from Jan 2008 to Dec 2015 was conducted. All patients with severe ptosis and poor levator function who underwent frontalis sling surgery with silicone rod were included in the study irrespective of the cause of ptosis and method of passing the sling. A complete ophthalmic and ptosis examination was done. In all the cases, the prolene suture was tied over the sleeve to tighten it and it was buried along with the silicone rod in forehead pocket. All the cases with granuloma formation were first subjected to a microbiological examination including culture and sensitivity to antibiotics. All the patients were given a trial of antibiotics.

RESULTS

We encountered 10 cases of granuloma in 120 eyes of 108 patients operated during this period. The duration between time of surgery and presentation varied from 2 weeks to 4 months. The microbiological examination revealed positive culture in 5 cases. None of the cases responded to the course of antibiotics given for 10 days. The histopathological examination done in 5 cases (2 of them culture positive and 3 of them culture negative) revealed granulomatous inflammation of non-specific type. The sling was explanted in all cases which resulted in prompt resolution of granuloma in 7-10 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The granuloma is primarily due to exposure of the sling itself or the sleeve enveloping the sling or the suture tied around the sleeve thereby. They do not respond to antibiotics but respond very well to explantation. These patients can be taken up for re-sling surgery after a waiting period of 3 months.

摘要

目的

回顾吊带手术后肉芽肿形成的病例,以找出可能的病因并提出进一步的管理计划。

材料与方法

对2008年1月至2015年12月期间108例接受硅胶棒额肌吊带手术的患者的120只眼进行回顾性分析。所有因重度上睑下垂且提上睑肌功能差而接受硅胶棒额肌吊带手术的患者均纳入研究,无论上睑下垂的病因及吊带穿过的方法。进行了全面的眼科和上睑下垂检查。在所有病例中,将聚丙烯缝线系在套管上以收紧,并与硅胶棒一起埋入额部袋中。所有肉芽肿形成的病例首先进行微生物学检查,包括培养及对抗生素的敏感性检测。所有患者均接受抗生素试验性治疗。

结果

在此期间接受手术的108例患者的120只眼中,我们遇到了10例肉芽肿病例。手术时间与出现症状的时间间隔从2周至4个月不等。微生物学检查显示5例培养阳性。给予10天的抗生素疗程后,所有病例均无反应。对5例(其中2例培养阳性,3例培养阴性)进行的组织病理学检查显示为非特异性肉芽肿性炎症。所有病例均取出吊带,7 - 10天内肉芽肿迅速消退。

结论

肉芽肿主要是由于吊带本身、包裹吊带的套管或系在套管周围的缝线暴露所致。它们对抗生素无反应,但对外植术反应良好。这些患者可在等待3个月后接受再次吊带手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验