Inadequate reporting of statistical results.
作者信息
Héroux Martin
机构信息
Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
出版信息
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Sep 1;116(3):1536-1537. doi: 10.1152/jn.00550.2016.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Inadequate reporting of statistical results.统计结果报告不充分。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Sep 1;116(3):1536-1537. doi: 10.1152/jn.00550.2016.
2
The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency.研究质量与被引频次之间的关系。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Sep 1;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-42.
3
Study design, statistical analyses, and results reporting in the bone marrow transplantation literature.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1995 Nov;1(1):47-53.
4
Inadequate visualization and reporting of ventricular function from transthoracic echocardiography after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后经胸超声心动图显示和报告心室功能不足。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010 Apr;24(2):280-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.07.019. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
5
Research without results: inadequate public reporting of clinical trial results.研究无果而终：临床试验结果的公开报告不充分。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 May;33(3):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
6
Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed.报告可靠性和一致性研究（GRRAS）指南被提出。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jun;48(6):661-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Apr 23.
7
The use of time-to-event methods in dental research: a comparison based on five dental journals over a 11-year period.在口腔医学研究中应用生存时间分析方法：基于五本口腔医学期刊十一年数据的比较。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;40 Suppl 1:36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00664.x.
8
An assessment of recently published gene expression data analyses: reporting experimental design and statistical factors.对近期发表的基因表达数据分析的评估：报告实验设计和统计因素。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Jun 21;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-27.
9
Exploration of statistical shrinkage parameters of disproportionality methods in spontaneous reporting system of China.中国自发呈报系统中不成比例法统计收缩参数的探索
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):962-70. doi: 10.1002/pds.3811. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
10
The BCG controversy. A methodological and statistical reappraisal.卡介苗争议：方法学与统计学的重新评估
JAMA. 1983 May 6;249(17):2362-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Foundations of plasma standards.血浆标准的基础。
Plasma Sources Sci Technol. 2023 Feb;32(2). doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/acb810. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
2
Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite Journal awareness and updated .尽管期刊有所意识并进行了更新，但糟糕的统计报告、不充分的数据呈现以及歪曲现象仍然存在。
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 20;12:1483. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.142841.1. eCollection 2023.
3
ChatGPT's Skills in Statistical Analysis Using the Example of Allergology: Do We Have Reason for Concern?以变态反应学为例看ChatGPT在统计分析方面的技能：我们是否有理由担忧？
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 15;11(18):2554. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182554.
4
Encouraging responsible reporting practices in the Instructions to Authors of neuroscience and physiology journals: There is room to improve.鼓励神经科学和生理学期刊《作者须知》中负责任的报告实践：有改进的空间。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0283753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283753. eCollection 2023.
5
Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility.质量产出检查表和内容评估（QuOCCA）：一种评估研究质量和可重复性的新工具。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 26;12(9):e060976. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060976.
6
Reporting matters: Brain mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation.报告事项：经颅磁刺激脑图谱
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Jan;40(1):352-353. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24371. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
7
Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice.尽管有编辑建议，但统计报告不佳、数据呈现不足和歪曲事实的情况仍然存在。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 15;13(8):e0202121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202121. eCollection 2018.
8
Questionable science and reproducibility in electrical brain stimulation research.脑电刺激研究中的可疑科学与可重复性
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0175635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175635. eCollection 2017.
本文引用的文献
1
The natural selection of bad science.劣质科学的自然选择。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Sep 21;3(9):160384. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160384. eCollection 2016 Sep.
2
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.统计检验、P 值、置信区间与检验效能：误解指南
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3. Epub 2016 May 21.
3
The fickle P value generates irreproducible results.变化无常的P值会产生不可重复的结果。
Nat Methods. 2015 Mar;12(3):179-85. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3288.
4
The new statistics: why and how.新的统计数据：原因和方法。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):7-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
5
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.停电：为什么小样本量会破坏神经科学的可靠性。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
6
High impact = high statistical standards? Not necessarily so.高影响 = 高统计标准？未必如此。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056180. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
7
Presenting data: can you follow a recipe?展示数据：你会遵循方法吗？
J Physiol. 2011 Nov 1;589(Pt 21):5007-11. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.221093.
8
Show the data, don't conceal them.公开数据，不要隐瞒。
J Physiol. 2011 Apr 15;589(Pt 8):1861-3. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.205062.
9
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.效应量、置信区间与统计显著性：生物学家实用指南
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Nov;82(4):591-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x.
10
Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society.美国生理学会出版期刊的统计报告指南。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004 Aug;287(2):R247-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00346.2004.
Zotero 插件