Alves Luís L, Becker Markus M, van Dijk Jan, Gans Timo, Go David B, Stapelmann Katharina, Tennyson Jonathan, Turner Miles M, Kushner Mark J
Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP), Greifswald, Germany.
Plasma Sources Sci Technol. 2023 Feb;32(2). doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/acb810. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
The field of low-temperature plasmas (LTPs) excels by virtue of its broad intellectual diversity, interdisciplinarity and range of applications. This great diversity also challenges researchers in communicating the outcomes of their investigations, as common practices and expectations for reporting vary widely in the many disciplines that either fall under the LTP umbrella or interact closely with LTP topics. These challenges encompass comparing measurements made in different laboratories, exchanging and sharing computer models, enabling reproducibility in experiments and computations using traceable and transparent methods and data, establishing metrics for reliability, and in translating fundamental findings to practice. In this paper, we address these challenges from the perspective of LTP standards for measurements, diagnostics, computations, reporting and plasma sources. This discussion on standards, or recommended best practices, and in some cases suggestions for standards or best practices, has the goal of improving communication, reproducibility and transparency within the LTP field and fields allied with LTPs. This discussion also acknowledges that standards and best practices, either recommended or at some point enforced, are ultimately a matter of judgment. These standards and recommended practices should not limit innovation nor prevent research breakthroughs from having real-time impact. Ultimately, the goal of our research community is to advance the entire LTP field and the many applications it touches through a shared set of expectations.
低温等离子体(LTP)领域因其广泛的知识多样性、跨学科性和应用范围而表现出色。这种巨大的多样性也给研究人员在交流其研究成果方面带来了挑战,因为在属于LTP范畴或与LTP主题密切相关的众多学科中,报告的常见做法和期望差异很大。这些挑战包括比较不同实验室进行的测量、交换和共享计算机模型、使用可追溯和透明的方法及数据在实验和计算中实现可重复性、建立可靠性指标以及将基础研究成果转化为实际应用。在本文中,我们从LTP测量、诊断、计算、报告和等离子体源标准的角度来应对这些挑战。关于标准或推荐最佳实践,以及在某些情况下对标准或最佳实践的建议的讨论,旨在改善LTP领域及与LTP相关领域内的交流、可重复性和透明度。该讨论还承认,无论是推荐的还是在某个时候强制执行的标准和最佳实践,最终都是一个判断问题。这些标准和推荐实践不应限制创新,也不应阻止研究突破产生实时影响。最终,我们研究群体的目标是通过一套共同的期望来推动整个LTP领域及其涉及的众多应用的发展。