Menear Matthew, Gervais Michel, Careau Emmanuelle, Chouinard Maud-Christine, Cloutier Guylaine, Delorme André, Dogba Maman Joyce, Dugas Michèle, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Gilbert Michel, Harvey Diane, Houle Janie, Kates Nick, Knowles Sara, Martin Neasa, Nease Donald, Pluye Pierre, Samson Esther, Zomahoun Hervé Tchala Vignon, Légaré France
CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Quebec, Canada Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 27;6(9):e012949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012949.
Collaborative mental healthcare (CMHC) has garnered worldwide interest as an effective, team-based approach to managing common mental disorders in primary care. However, questions remain about how CMHC works and why it works in some circumstances but not others. In this study, we will review the evidence on one understudied but potentially critical component of CMHC, namely the engagement of patients and families in care. Our aims are to describe the strategies used to engage people with depression or anxiety disorders and their families in CMHC and understand how these strategies work, for whom and in what circumstances.
We are conducting a review with systematic and realist review components. Review part 1 seeks to identify and describe the patient and family engagement strategies featured in CMHC interventions based on systematic searches and descriptive analysis of these interventions. We will use a 2012 Cochrane review of CMHC as a starting point and perform new searches in multiple databases and trial registers to retrieve more recent CMHC intervention studies. In review part 2, we will build and refine programme theories for each of these engagement strategies. Initial theory building will proceed iteratively through content expert consultations, electronic searches for theoretical literature and review team brainstorming sessions. Cluster searches will then retrieve additional data on contexts, mechanisms and outcomes associated with engagement strategies, and pairs of review authors will analyse and synthesise the evidence and adjust initial programme theories.
Our review follows a participatory approach with multiple knowledge users and persons with lived experience of mental illness. These partners will help us develop and tailor project outputs, including publications, policy briefs, training materials and guidance on how to make CMHC more patient-centred and family-centred.
CRD42015025522.
协作式精神卫生保健(CMHC)作为一种在初级保健中管理常见精神障碍的有效、基于团队的方法,已引起全球关注。然而,关于CMHC如何运作以及为何在某些情况下有效而在其他情况下无效的问题仍然存在。在本研究中,我们将回顾关于CMHC一个研究较少但可能至关重要的组成部分的证据,即患者及其家庭参与护理的情况。我们的目的是描述在CMHC中促使患有抑郁症或焦虑症的患者及其家庭参与的策略,并了解这些策略如何发挥作用、适用于谁以及在何种情况下发挥作用。
我们正在进行一项包含系统评价和实效评价成分的综述。综述的第一部分旨在基于对这些干预措施的系统检索和描述性分析,识别和描述CMHC干预措施中所采用的患者及家庭参与策略。我们将以2012年Cochrane对CMHC的综述为起点,在多个数据库和试验注册库中进行新的检索,以获取更新的CMHC干预研究。在综述的第二部分,我们将为每种参与策略构建并完善项目理论。初步的理论构建将通过内容专家咨询、对理论文献的电子检索以及综述团队的头脑风暴会议反复进行。聚类检索随后将获取与参与策略相关的背景、机制和结果的额外数据,综述作者对将分析和综合证据,并调整初步的项目理论。
我们的综述采用参与式方法,有多个知识使用者以及有精神疾病生活经历的人参与。这些合作伙伴将帮助我们开发和定制项目成果,包括出版物、政策简报、培训材料以及关于如何使CMHC更以患者为中心和以家庭为中心的指南。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42015025522。