Seidell J C, Björntorp P, Sjöström L, Sannerstedt R, Krotkiewski M, Kvist H
Department of Medicine, Sahlgrens Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Int J Obes. 1989;13(3):289-303.
We studied 24 healthy men (25-50 years old) covering a wide range of fatness (body mass index range: 21-34 kg/m2) and fat distribution (waist/hip range: 0.75-1.06). Computed tomography scans were taken at five levels (thigh, hip, waist, arm, and liver) from which fat, muscle and bone areas were calculated. Both waist/hip and BMI were correlated with fat areas in the thigh, arm and waist scans. BMI showed stronger correlations with peripheral fat areas, whereas waist/hip showed stronger correlations with fat areas in the waist scan (particularly with visceral fat area: r = 0.88, P less than 0.001). BMI was correlated with muscle and bone areas in the thigh scan. In multiple regression BMI was, independently of waist/hip and age, positively correlated with fat areas in the arm, thigh, and waist (not with visceral fat) and muscle and bone areas in the thigh. Waist/hip was independently of BMI and age correlated with fat areas in the arm and waist, including visceral fat area (but not with fat areas in the thigh). Moreover, waist/hip showed an independent negative correlation with muscle area in the thigh, muscle endurance and physical activity. Serum triglycerides, plasma insulin, glucose, uric acid and diastolic and systolic blood pressure were associated with visceral fat area but also to anthropometric indicators of abdominal fat distribution (especially waist/hip ratio). Liver attenuation, but not the liver/spleen attenuation ratio, was associated with some liver enzymes and BMI but not with waist/hip or metabolic parameters. We conclude that a higher BMI is associated with increased central and peripheral fat stores (but not visceral fat) and increased thigh muscle whereas waist/hip is primarily associated with increased central fat stores (noteably with visceral fat), decreased thigh muscle and reduced physical fitness. It is suggested that physical training might be an important element in the treatment of abdominal obesity in men.
我们研究了24名健康男性(年龄在25至50岁之间),他们的肥胖程度(体重指数范围:21至34千克/平方米)和脂肪分布情况(腰臀比范围:0.75至1.06)差异较大。在五个层面(大腿、臀部、腰部、手臂和肝脏)进行了计算机断层扫描,据此计算出脂肪、肌肉和骨骼面积。腰臀比和体重指数均与大腿、手臂和腰部扫描中的脂肪面积相关。体重指数与外周脂肪面积的相关性更强,而腰臀比与腰部扫描中的脂肪面积相关性更强(尤其是与内脏脂肪面积:r = 0.88,P小于0.001)。体重指数与大腿扫描中的肌肉和骨骼面积相关。在多元回归分析中,体重指数独立于腰臀比和年龄,与手臂、大腿和腰部的脂肪面积(而非内脏脂肪)以及大腿的肌肉和骨骼面积呈正相关。腰臀比独立于体重指数和年龄,与手臂和腰部的脂肪面积相关,包括内脏脂肪面积(但与大腿的脂肪面积无关)。此外,腰臀比与大腿的肌肉面积、肌肉耐力和身体活动呈独立负相关。血清甘油三酯、血浆胰岛素、葡萄糖、尿酸以及舒张压和收缩压与内脏脂肪面积相关,但也与腹部脂肪分布的人体测量指标(尤其是腰臀比)相关。肝脏衰减,但不是肝脏/脾脏衰减比,与一些肝酶和体重指数相关,但与腰臀比或代谢参数无关。我们得出结论,较高的体重指数与中枢和外周脂肪储存增加(但不是内脏脂肪)以及大腿肌肉增加有关,而腰臀比主要与中枢脂肪储存增加(特别是内脏脂肪)、大腿肌肉减少和身体素质下降有关。建议体育锻炼可能是男性腹部肥胖治疗中的一个重要因素。