Suppr超能文献

腹型肥胖与认知功能的因果关系:一项跨种族孟德尔随机化研究。

Causality of abdominal obesity on cognition: a trans-ethnic Mendelian randomization study.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Safety and Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Obes (Lond). 2022 Aug;46(8):1487-1492. doi: 10.1038/s41366-022-01138-8. Epub 2022 May 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obesity has been associated with cognition in observational studies; however, whether its effect is confounding or a reverse causality remains inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships of overall obesity, measured by body mass index (BMI), and abdominal adiposity, measured by waist-hip ratio adjusted for BMI (WHRadjBMI), and cognition across European and Asian populations using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

METHODS

We used publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data of European ancestry, including BMI (n = 322,154) and WHRadjBMI (n = 210,088) from the GIANT consortium, and cognition performance (n = 257,828) from the UK Biobank and COGENT consortium. Data for individuals of Asian ancestry were retrieved from Taiwan Biobank to perform GWAS for BMI (n = 65,689), WHRadjBMI (n = 65,683), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE, n = 21,273). MR analysis was carried out using the inverse-variance weighted method for the main results. Further, we examined the overall pleiotropy by MR-Egger intercept, and detected and adjusted for possible outliers using MR PRESSO.

RESULTS

No causal effect of BMI on cognition performance (beta [95% CI] = 0.00 [-0.07, 0.07], p value = 0.91) was found for Europeans; however, a 1-SD increase in WHRadjBMI was associated with a 0.07 standardized score decrease in cognition performance (beta [95% CI] = -0.07 [-0.12, -0.02], p value = 0.006). Further, no causal effect of BMI on MMSE (beta [95% CI] = 0.01 [-0.08, 0.10], p = 0.91) was found for Asians; however, a 1-SD increase in WHRadjBMI was associated with a 0.17 standardized score decrease in MMSE (beta [95% CI] = -0.17 [-0.30, -0.03], p = 0.02). In both populations, overall pleiotropy was not detected, and outliers did not affect the robustness of the main findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This trans-ethnic MR study reveals that abdominal adiposity, as measured by WHR adjusted for BMI, impairs cognition, whereas weak evidence suggests that BMI impairs cognition.

摘要

背景

肥胖与观察性研究中的认知有关;然而,其影响是混杂因素还是反向因果关系仍不清楚。本研究旨在使用孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,针对欧洲和亚洲人群,调查整体肥胖(由体重指数(BMI)衡量)和腹部肥胖(由 BMI 校正的腰臀比(WHRadjBMI)衡量)与认知之间的因果关系。

方法

我们使用了 GIANT 联盟提供的欧洲血统人群的公开全基因组关联研究(GWAS)汇总数据,包括 BMI(n=322154)和 WHRadjBMI(n=210088),以及 UK Biobank 和 COGENT 联盟的认知表现(n=257828)。从台湾生物银行获取亚洲血统个体的 GWAS 数据,用于 BMI(n=65689)、WHRadjBMI(n=65683)和 Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE,n=21273)。主要结果采用逆方差加权法进行 MR 分析。此外,我们通过 MR-Egger 截距检查了整体多效性,并使用 MR PRESSO 检测和调整了可能的异常值。

结果

在欧洲人群中,BMI 对认知表现无因果影响(β[95%CI] = 0.00[-0.07, 0.07],p 值=0.91);然而,WHRadjBMI 增加 1-SD 与认知表现的 0.07 个标准化分数下降相关(β[95%CI] = -0.07[-0.12, -0.02],p 值=0.006)。此外,在亚洲人群中,BMI 对 MMSE 无因果影响(β[95%CI] = 0.01[-0.08, 0.10],p 值=0.91);然而,WHRadjBMI 增加 1-SD 与 MMSE 的 0.17 个标准化分数下降相关(β[95%CI] = -0.17[-0.30, -0.03],p 值=0.02)。在两个人群中,均未检测到整体多效性,异常值并未影响主要发现的稳健性。

结论

这项跨种族的 MR 研究表明,腹部肥胖(由 BMI 校正的腰臀比衡量)会损害认知,而微弱的证据表明 BMI 会损害认知。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验