• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无国界医生组织(MSF)为何提供安全堕胎护理以及这涉及哪些方面。

Why Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides safe abortion care and what that involves.

作者信息

Schulte-Hillen Catrin, Staderini Nelly, Saint-Sauveur Jean-François

机构信息

Médecins Sans Frontières International, 78 rue de Lausanne, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland.

Médecins Sans Frontières Switzerland, 78 rue de Lausanne, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Confl Health. 2016 Sep 21;10:19. doi: 10.1186/s13031-016-0086-5. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s13031-016-0086-5
PMID:27679655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5030736/
Abstract

MSF responds to needs for the termination of pregnancy, including on request (TPR); it is part of the organization's work aimed at reducing maternal mortality and suffering; and preventing unsafe abortions in the countries where we work. Following the publication of "Why don't humanitarian organizations provide safe abortion care?" we offer an insight into MSF's experience over the past few years. The article looks at the legal concerns and proposes that the importance of addressing maternal mortality should replace them and the operational set-up and action organized in a way that mitigates risks. MSF took a policy decision on safe abortion care in 2004; the fact that care did not expand rapidly to relevant MSF projects came as a surprise, reflecting the important weight social norms around abortion have everywhere. The need to engage in an open dialogue with staff, relevant medical actors and at community level became more obvious. Finally the article looks some key lessons that have emerged for the organization as part of the effort to prevent ill health, maternal death and suffering caused by unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion.

摘要

无国界医生组织回应终止妊娠的需求,包括应要求提供终止妊娠服务(TPR);这是该组织旨在降低孕产妇死亡率和痛苦、并在我们开展工作的国家预防不安全堕胎的工作的一部分。在《为何人道主义组织不提供安全堕胎护理?》一文发表后,我们深入探讨了无国界医生组织过去几年的经验。文章审视了法律方面的担忧,并提出应对孕产妇死亡率的重要性应取代这些担忧,以及应以降低风险的方式进行业务设置和组织行动。无国界医生组织在2004年就安全堕胎护理做出了政策决定;护理服务未能迅速扩展到相关的无国界医生项目这一事实令人惊讶,这反映出堕胎相关的社会规范在各地都具有重要影响。与工作人员、相关医疗行为体以及社区层面开展公开对话的必要性变得更加明显。最后,文章探讨了该组织在预防意外怀孕和不安全堕胎导致的健康问题、孕产妇死亡和痛苦的努力中所汲取的一些关键经验教训。

相似文献

1
Why Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides safe abortion care and what that involves.无国界医生组织(MSF)为何提供安全堕胎护理以及这涉及哪些方面。
Confl Health. 2016 Sep 21;10:19. doi: 10.1186/s13031-016-0086-5. eCollection 2016.
2
Catalyst for change: Lessons learned from overcoming barriers to providing safe abortion care in Médecins Sans Frontières projects.变革的催化剂:从无国界医生组织项目中克服提供安全堕胎护理障碍中学到的经验教训。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Mar;56(1):60-71. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12209. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
3
Questionable accountability: MSF and Sphere in 2003.可疑的问责制:2003年的无国界医生组织与《斯phere标准》
Disasters. 2004 Jun;28(2):176-89. doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00251.x.
4
Abortion policy and women's health in developing countries.发展中国家的堕胎政策与妇女健康
Int J Health Serv. 1990;20(2):297-314. doi: 10.2190/V08N-UE7N-TNBH-RA4P.
5
"Nationals" and "expatriates": challenges of fulfilling "sans frontières" ("without borders") ideals in international humanitarian action.“国民”与“侨民”:国际人道行动中实现“无国界”理想的挑战。
Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(1):109-22.
6
Unwanted pregnancy--medical and ethical dimensions.意外怀孕——医学与伦理层面
Med J Malaysia. 2003 Mar;58 Suppl A:23-35.
7
Ethical dilemmas in medical humanitarian practice: cases for reflection from Médecins Sans Frontières.医学人道主义实践中的伦理困境:无国界医生组织的反思案例。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Mar;37(3):162-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038448. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
8
Unsafe abortion: global and regional incidence, trends, consequences, and challenges.不安全堕胎:全球及区域发病率、趋势、后果与挑战
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Dec;31(12):1149-58.
9
Abortion, reproductive rights and maternal mortality.堕胎、生殖权利与孕产妇死亡率。
Focus Gend. 1994 Jun;2(2):45-50. doi: 10.1080/09682869308520025.
10
When Helping Babies Breathe Is Not Enough: Designing a Novel, Mid-Level Neonatal Resuscitation Algorithm for Médecins Sans Frontières Field Teams Working in Low-Resource Hospital Settings.当“帮助婴儿呼吸”法不足够时:为在资源匮乏医院环境中工作的无国界医生现场团队设计一种新型的中级新生儿复苏算法
Neonatology. 2018;114(2):112-123. doi: 10.1159/000486705. Epub 2018 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and safety of abortion in two humanitarian settings in Uganda and Kenya: a respondent-driven sampling study.乌干达和肯尼亚两个人道主义环境下人工流产的发生率及安全性:一项应答驱动抽样研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 5;83:103200. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103200. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Self-managed abortion as a humanitarian revolution: accounts of a telehealth pilot in the Middle East.自我管理堕胎作为一场人道主义革命:中东远程医疗试点项目的报告
Confl Health. 2025 Feb 11;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00641-1.
3
Maternal Health in Crisis: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Safe Abortion Care in Humanitarian Crises.危机中的孕产妇健康:关于人道主义危机中安全堕胎护理的障碍与促进因素的范围审查
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Sep 21;2:699121. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.699121. eCollection 2021.
4
The Potential of Self-Managed Abortion to Expand Abortion Access in Humanitarian Contexts.在人道主义背景下,自我管理堕胎扩大堕胎服务可及性的潜力。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Aug 13;2:681039. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.681039. eCollection 2021.
5
"Better dead than being mocked": an anthropological study on perceptions and attitudes towards unwanted pregnancy and abortion in the Democratic Republic of Congo.“宁死不受嘲笑”:对刚果民主共和国意外怀孕和堕胎的看法和态度的人类学研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1852644. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1852644.
6
Navigating the crisis landscape: engaging the ministry of health and United Nations agencies to make abortion care available to Rohingya refugees.应对危机局势:与卫生部及联合国机构合作,为难民提供堕胎护理服务。 (注:需要说明的是,在罗兴亚难民问题中,这样的表述涉及到极为复杂且敏感的伦理、法律及人道主义等多方面争议,在实际情况中,堕胎问题在不同国家、地区及群体中有不同的考量和规范。)
Confl Health. 2020 Jul 23;14:50. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00298-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Wishful thinking versus operational commitment: is the international guidance on priority sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian settings becoming unrealistic?一厢情愿与实际行动:关于人道主义背景下性与生殖健康优先干预措施的国际指南是否正变得不切实际?
Confl Health. 2018 May 29;12:32. doi: 10.1186/s13031-018-0157-x. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Why don't humanitarian organizations provide safe abortion services?为什么人道主义组织不提供安全堕胎服务?
Confl Health. 2016 Mar 24;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13031-016-0075-8. eCollection 2016.
2
Reductions in abortion-related mortality following policy reform: evidence from Romania, South Africa and Bangladesh.政策改革后堕胎相关死亡率的降低:来自罗马尼亚、南非和孟加拉国的证据。
Reprod Health. 2011 Dec 22;8:39. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-8-39.