• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么人道主义组织不提供安全堕胎服务?

Why don't humanitarian organizations provide safe abortion services?

作者信息

McGinn Therese, Casey Sara E

机构信息

Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Ave, New York, NY 10032 USA.

出版信息

Confl Health. 2016 Mar 24;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13031-016-0075-8. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s13031-016-0075-8
PMID:27014367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4806475/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although sexual and reproductive health services have become more available in humanitarian settings over the last decade, safe abortion services are still rarely provided. The authors' observations suggest that four reasons are typically given for this gap: 'There's no need'; 'Abortion is too complicated to provide in crises'; 'Donors don't fund abortion services'; and 'Abortion is illegal'.

DISCUSSION

However, each of these reasons is based on false premises. Unsafe abortion is a major cause of maternal mortality globally, and the collapse of health systems in crises suggests it likely increases in humanitarian settings. Abortion procedures can be safely performed in health centers by mid-level providers without sophisticated equipment or supplies. Although US government aid does not fund abortion-related activities, other donors, including many European governments, do fund abortion services. In most countries, covering 99 % of the world's population, abortion is permitted under some circumstances; it is illegal without exception in only six countries. International law supports improved access to safe abortion.

SUMMARY

As none of the reasons often cited for not providing these services is valid, it is the responsibility of humanitarian NGOs to decide where they stand regarding their commitment to humanitarian standards and women's right to high quality and non-discriminatory health services. Providing safe abortion to women who become pregnant as a result of rape in war may be a more comfortable place for organizations to begin the discussion. Making safe abortion available will improve women's health and human rights and save lives.

摘要

背景

尽管在过去十年里,性与生殖健康服务在人道主义环境中变得更加普及,但安全堕胎服务仍然很少提供。作者的观察表明,造成这种差距通常有四个原因:“没有需求”;“在危机中提供堕胎过于复杂”;“捐助者不资助堕胎服务”;以及“堕胎是非法的”。

讨论

然而,这些原因中的每一个都基于错误的前提。不安全堕胎是全球孕产妇死亡的主要原因,危机中卫生系统的崩溃表明在人道主义环境中不安全堕胎情况可能会增加。堕胎手术可由中级医疗人员在没有复杂设备或物资的健康中心安全进行。虽然美国政府援助不资助与堕胎相关的活动,但其他捐助者,包括许多欧洲国家政府,确实资助堕胎服务。在占世界人口99%的大多数国家,在某些情况下堕胎是允许的;只有六个国家完全禁止堕胎。国际法支持增加获得安全堕胎服务的机会。

总结

由于经常被提及的不提供这些服务的原因都不成立,人道主义非政府组织有责任决定他们在遵守人道主义标准以及妇女获得高质量和非歧视性卫生服务权利方面的立场。为战争中因强奸而怀孕的妇女提供安全堕胎服务可能是各组织开始讨论的一个更容易接受的切入点。提供安全堕胎服务将改善妇女的健康和人权并挽救生命。

相似文献

1
Why don't humanitarian organizations provide safe abortion services?为什么人道主义组织不提供安全堕胎服务?
Confl Health. 2016 Mar 24;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13031-016-0075-8. eCollection 2016.
2
Abortion policy and women's health in developing countries.发展中国家的堕胎政策与妇女健康
Int J Health Serv. 1990;20(2):297-314. doi: 10.2190/V08N-UE7N-TNBH-RA4P.
3
Navigating the crisis landscape: engaging the ministry of health and United Nations agencies to make abortion care available to Rohingya refugees.应对危机局势:与卫生部及联合国机构合作,为难民提供堕胎护理服务。 (注:需要说明的是,在罗兴亚难民问题中,这样的表述涉及到极为复杂且敏感的伦理、法律及人道主义等多方面争议,在实际情况中,堕胎问题在不同国家、地区及群体中有不同的考量和规范。)
Confl Health. 2020 Jul 23;14:50. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00298-6. eCollection 2020.
4
Protecting safe abortion in humanitarian settings: overcoming legal and policy barriers.在人道主义环境中保护安全堕胎:克服法律和政策障碍。
Reprod Health Matters. 2017 Nov;25(51):40-47. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1400361. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
5
Maternal Health in Crisis: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Safe Abortion Care in Humanitarian Crises.危机中的孕产妇健康:关于人道主义危机中安全堕胎护理的障碍与促进因素的范围审查
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Sep 21;2:699121. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.699121. eCollection 2021.
6
The U.S. Global Gag Rule in Ethiopia: a foreign policy challenging domestic sexual and reproductive health and rights gains.美国在埃塞俄比亚的全球套套禁令:一项挑战国内性与生殖健康及权利的外交政策。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(Suppl 1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01329-6.
7
Abortion, reproductive rights and maternal mortality.堕胎、生殖权利与孕产妇死亡率。
Focus Gend. 1994 Jun;2(2):45-50. doi: 10.1080/09682869308520025.
8
Abortion service provision in South Asia: A comparative study of four countries.南亚的堕胎服务提供情况:四个国家的比较研究。
Contraception. 2020 Sep;102(3):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
A cross-cultural history of abortion.堕胎的跨文化史。
Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;13(1):1-17.
10
Unwanted pregnancy--medical and ethical dimensions.意外怀孕——医学与伦理层面
Med J Malaysia. 2003 Mar;58 Suppl A:23-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Armed Conflict and Pregnancy Termination: Evidence from Burkina Faso.武装冲突与终止妊娠:来自布基纳法索的证据。
Spat Demogr. 2024 Dec;12(3). doi: 10.1007/s40980-024-00129-9. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Estimating the incidence of induced abortion among women in refugee settings in Ethiopia.估算埃塞俄比亚难民环境中女性人工流产的发生率。
Confl Health. 2025 Jul 1;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13031-025-00676-y.
3
Incidence and safety of abortion in two humanitarian settings in Uganda and Kenya: a respondent-driven sampling study.乌干达和肯尼亚两个人道主义环境下人工流产的发生率及安全性:一项应答驱动抽样研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 5;83:103200. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103200. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Perceptions and attitudes of Rohingya community stakeholders to pregnancy termination services: a qualitative study in camps of Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.罗兴亚社区利益相关者对终止妊娠服务的认知与态度:孟加拉国科克斯巴扎尔难民营的定性研究
Confl Health. 2024 Mar 4;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00574-9.
5
High severity of abortion complications in fragile and conflict-affected settings: a cross-sectional study in two referral hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa (AMoCo study).脆弱和受冲突影响环境下流产并发症的高严重程度:撒哈拉以南非洲两家转诊医院的横断面研究(AMoCo 研究)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 4;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05427-6.
6
Safe abortion within the Venezuelan complex humanitarian emergency: understanding context as key to identifying the potential for digital self-care tools in expanding access.委内瑞拉复杂人道主义紧急情况下的安全堕胎:理解背景是识别数字自我护理工具在扩大可及性方面潜力的关键。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(3):2067104. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2067104.
7
Exploring the feasibility of establishing a core set of sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health indicators in humanitarian settings: a multimethods, multicountry qualitative study protocol.在人道主义环境中建立一套核心的性健康、生殖健康、母婴健康、新生儿健康、儿童健康和青少年健康指标的可行性研究:一项多方法、多国定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 14;11(12):e041270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041270.
8
Maternal Health in Crisis: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Safe Abortion Care in Humanitarian Crises.危机中的孕产妇健康:关于人道主义危机中安全堕胎护理的障碍与促进因素的范围审查
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Sep 21;2:699121. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.699121. eCollection 2021.
9
The Potential of Self-Managed Abortion to Expand Abortion Access in Humanitarian Contexts.在人道主义背景下,自我管理堕胎扩大堕胎服务可及性的潜力。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Aug 13;2:681039. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.681039. eCollection 2021.
10
Strengthening healthcare providers' capacity for safe abortion and post-abortion care services in humanitarian settings: lessons learned from the clinical outreach refresher training model (S-CORT) in Uganda, Nigeria, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.加强医疗服务提供者在人道主义环境中提供安全堕胎和堕胎后护理服务的能力:从乌干达、尼日利亚和刚果民主共和国的临床外展进修培训模式(S-CORT)中汲取的经验教训。
Confl Health. 2021 Apr 6;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00344-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing unsafe abortions through task shifting and sharing.通过任务转移和分担来预防不安全堕胎。
Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61461-1.
2
Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studies.在三个人道主义环境中生殖健康服务的进展和差距:混合方法案例研究。
Confl Health. 2015 Feb 2;9(Suppl 1 Taking Stock of Reproductive Health in Humanitarian):S3. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-9-S1-S3. eCollection 2015.
3
Tracking humanitarian funding for reproductive health: a systematic analysis of health and protection proposals from 2002-2013.追踪生殖健康方面的人道主义资金:2002-2013 年卫生和保护提案的系统分析。
Confl Health. 2015 Feb 2;9(Suppl 1 Taking Stock of Reproductive Health in Humanitarian):S2. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-9-S1-S2. eCollection 2015.
4
Causes of maternal mortality in Ethiopia: a significant decline in abortion related death.埃塞俄比亚孕产妇死亡原因:与堕胎相关的死亡显著下降。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014 Sep;24 Suppl(0 Suppl):15-28. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v24i0.3s.
5
Who can provide effective and safe termination of pregnancy care? A systematic review*.谁能提供有效且安全的终止妊娠护理?一项系统评价*。
BJOG. 2013 Jan;120(1):23-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03464.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
6
Human rights accountability for maternal death and failure to provide safe, legal abortion: the significance of two ground-breaking CEDAW decisions.对孕产妇死亡和未能提供安全合法堕胎服务的人权问责:两项具有开创性的消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约裁决的意义。
Reprod Health Matters. 2012 Jun;20(39):31-9. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39610-9.
7
Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008.人工流产:1995 年至 2008 年全球发生率和趋势。
Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):625-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
8
Frequency and physical factors associated with gender-based violence in the internally displaced people of Pakistan.与巴基斯坦境内流离失所者基于性别的暴力相关的频率和物理因素。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 Jan;22(1):63-5.
9
Experiences of female survivors of sexual violence in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo: a mixed-methods study.刚果民主共和国东部性暴力女幸存者的经历:一项混合方法研究。
Confl Health. 2011 Nov 2;5:25. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-5-25.
10
Incidence of severe acute maternal morbidity associated with abortion: a systematic review.流产相关严重急性产妇发病率:系统评价。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Feb;17(2):177-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02896.x. Epub 2011 Oct 31.