• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对危机局势:与卫生部及联合国机构合作,为难民提供堕胎护理服务。 (注:需要说明的是,在罗兴亚难民问题中,这样的表述涉及到极为复杂且敏感的伦理、法律及人道主义等多方面争议,在实际情况中,堕胎问题在不同国家、地区及群体中有不同的考量和规范。)

Navigating the crisis landscape: engaging the ministry of health and United Nations agencies to make abortion care available to Rohingya refugees.

作者信息

Fetters Tamara, Rubayet Sayed, Sultana Sharmin, Nahar Shamila, Tofigh Shadie, Jones Lea, Samandari Ghazaleh, Powell Bill

机构信息

Ipas, Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA.

Ipas Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Confl Health. 2020 Jul 23;14:50. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00298-6. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s13031-020-00298-6
PMID:32760438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7379756/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unintended and unwanted pregnancies likely increase during displacement, making the need for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, especially safe abortion, even greater. Attention is growing around barriers to safe abortion care for displaced women as donor, non-governmental and civil society actors become more convinced of this need and reports of systematic sexual violence against women are more widely documented around the world. Yet a reluctance to truly change practice remains tied to some commonly reported reasons: 1) There is no need; 2) Abortion is illegal in the setting; 3) Donors do not fund abortion services, and; 4) Abortion is too complicated during acute emergencies. While there is global progress towards acknowledging the deficit of attention and evidence on abortion services in humanitarian settings, improvements in actual services have yet to follow.

CASE PRESENTATION

In August 2017, over 700,000 Rohingya refugees fled Myanmar for Bangladesh. Women and girls fled homes and communities - many experienced terrible violence - and arrived at camps in Bangladesh with SRH needs, including unwanted pregnancies. With funding from UNFPA and others, Ipas trained providers and established safe induced abortion (called menstrual regulation (MR) in Bangladesh) and contraception services in October 2017.Ipas Bangladesh initiated the trainings in coordination with the government's health system and international aid agencies. Training approaches were modified so that providers could be trained quickly with minimal disruption to their ability to provide care. Within one month of the arrival of refugees, MR services had been established in eight facilities, for the first time during an acute emergency. By mid-2019, over 300 health workers from 37 health facilities had attended training in MR, postabortion care (PAC), and contraception. Over 8000 Rohingya refugees have received abortion-related care, more than three-quarters of which were MR procedures; over 26,000 women and girls have received contraception at these facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates demand for abortion care exists among refugees. It also illustrates that these needs could have been easily overlooked in the complex environment of competing priorities during an emergency. When safe abortion services were made available, with relative ease and institutional support, women sought assistance, saving them from complications of unsafe abortions.

摘要

背景

流离失所期间意外怀孕和非意愿怀孕的情况可能会增加,这使得对性与生殖健康(SRH)服务,尤其是安全堕胎服务的需求变得更大。随着捐助方、非政府组织和民间社会行为体越发确信这种需求,且系统性暴力侵害妇女行为的报道在全球范围内得到更广泛记录,围绕流离失所妇女获得安全堕胎护理的障碍的关注度日益提高。然而,一些常见的原因仍然导致人们不愿真正改变做法:1)没有需求;2)当地堕胎是非法的;3)捐助方不为堕胎服务提供资金;4)在急性紧急情况下堕胎过于复杂。尽管在认识到人道主义环境中堕胎服务缺乏关注和证据方面取得了全球进展,但实际服务的改善仍未跟进。

病例报告

2017年8月,超过70万罗兴亚难民从缅甸逃往孟加拉国。妇女和女孩逃离家园和社区——许多人遭受了可怕的暴力——抵达孟加拉国的营地时,她们有性与生殖健康需求,包括意外怀孕。在联合国人口基金和其他方面的资助下,国际人口服务组织(Ipas)于2017年10月培训了医护人员,并建立了安全人工流产(在孟加拉国称为月经调节(MR))和避孕服务。Ipas孟加拉国与政府卫生系统和国际援助机构协调开展了培训。培训方法进行了调整,以便能在对医护人员提供护理能力造成最小干扰的情况下快速对其进行培训。在难民抵达后的一个月内,在八家机构建立了月经调节服务,这是急性紧急情况下的首次。到2019年年中,来自37家卫生机构的300多名医护人员参加了月经调节、流产后护理(PAC)和避孕方面的培训。超过8000名罗兴亚难民接受了与堕胎相关的护理,其中超过四分之三是月经调节手术;超过26000名妇女和女孩在这些机构接受了避孕服务。

结论

本研究表明难民对堕胎护理存在需求。它还表明,在紧急情况下众多优先事项相互竞争的复杂环境中,这些需求可能很容易被忽视。当安全堕胎服务在相对容易且有机构支持的情况下可用时,妇女会寻求帮助,使她们免受不安全堕胎的并发症之苦。

相似文献

1
Navigating the crisis landscape: engaging the ministry of health and United Nations agencies to make abortion care available to Rohingya refugees.应对危机局势:与卫生部及联合国机构合作,为难民提供堕胎护理服务。 (注:需要说明的是,在罗兴亚难民问题中,这样的表述涉及到极为复杂且敏感的伦理、法律及人道主义等多方面争议,在实际情况中,堕胎问题在不同国家、地区及群体中有不同的考量和规范。)
Confl Health. 2020 Jul 23;14:50. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00298-6. eCollection 2020.
2
Findings of an evaluation of a sexual and reproductive health programme in a humanitarian setting for the forcibly displaced Myanmar nationals in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.在孟加拉国考克斯巴扎尔为被迫流离失所的缅甸国民提供的人道主义环境中的性健康和生殖健康方案评估结果。
J Glob Health. 2024 Sep 6;14:04146. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04146.
3
Expanding Access to Comprehensive Abortion Care in Humanitarian Contexts: Case Study from the Rohingya Refugee Camps in Bangladesh.在人道主义背景下扩大全面堕胎护理服务的可及性:来自孟加拉国罗兴亚难民营的案例研究
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Dec 14;46(Suppl 1):45-52. doi: 10.1363/46e0820.
4
Situation analysis for delivering integrated comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services in humanitarian crisis condition for Rohingya refugees in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh: protocol for a mixed-method study.在孟加拉国 Cox's Bazar 为罗兴亚难民提供人道主义危机条件下综合全面性与生殖健康服务的情况分析:混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 3;9(7):e028340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028340.
5
Health professionals' perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 on sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) and SGBV services in Rohingya refugee communities in Bangladesh.卫生专业人员对孟加拉国罗兴亚难民营中 COVID-19 对性暴力和基于性别的暴力(SGBV)及 SGBV 服务的影响的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08122-y.
6
A qualitative study on health care providers' experiences of providing comprehensive abortion care in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.关于孟加拉国科克斯巴扎尔医疗服务提供者提供全面堕胎护理经历的定性研究。
Confl Health. 2021 Jan 13;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00338-9.
7
"Most of the cases are very similar.": Documenting and corroborating conflict-related sexual violence affecting Rohingya refugees.“大多数案件都非常相似。”:记录和证实影响罗兴亚难民的与冲突相关的性暴力。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):700. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13038-7.
8
The culture, mental health and psychosocial wellbeing of Rohingya refugees: a systematic review.罗兴亚难民的文化、心理健康和社会心理福祉:系统评价。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Oct;28(5):489-494. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000192. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
Abortion service provision in South Asia: A comparative study of four countries.南亚的堕胎服务提供情况:四个国家的比较研究。
Contraception. 2020 Sep;102(3):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
A Systematic review of sexual and reproductive health needs, experiences, access to services, and interventions among the rohingya and the afghan refugee women of reproductive age in Asia.亚洲罗兴亚和育龄阿富汗难民妇女的性与生殖健康需求、经验、服务获取和干预措施的系统评价。
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2022 Jan-Jun;11(1):42-53. doi: 10.4103/WHO-SEAJPH.WHO-SEAJPH_144_21.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and safety of abortion in two humanitarian settings in Uganda and Kenya: a respondent-driven sampling study.乌干达和肯尼亚两个人道主义环境下人工流产的发生率及安全性:一项应答驱动抽样研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 5;83:103200. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103200. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Self-managed abortion as a humanitarian revolution: accounts of a telehealth pilot in the Middle East.自我管理堕胎作为一场人道主义革命:中东远程医疗试点项目的报告
Confl Health. 2025 Feb 11;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00641-1.
3
Innovative strategies and implementation science approaches for health delivery among migrants in humanitarian settings: A scoping review.人道主义环境中移民健康服务的创新策略与实施科学方法:一项范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 2;4(12):e0003514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003514. eCollection 2024.
4
Sexual Violence, Disclosure Pattern, and Abortion and Post-Abortion Care Services in Displaced People's Camps in Africa: A Scoping Review.非洲流离失所者难民营中的性暴力、披露模式以及堕胎和堕胎后护理服务:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 30;21(8):1001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081001.
5
Perceptions and attitudes of Rohingya community stakeholders to pregnancy termination services: a qualitative study in camps of Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.罗兴亚社区利益相关者对终止妊娠服务的认知与态度:孟加拉国科克斯巴扎尔难民营的定性研究
Confl Health. 2024 Mar 4;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00574-9.
6
Women's participation in childbearing decision-making and its effects on short-interval births in Rohingya refugee camps of Bangladesh.孟加拉国罗兴亚难民营中妇女参与生育决策及其对短间隔生育的影响。
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Jul 17;15:100250. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100250. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
The Potential of Self-Managed Abortion to Expand Abortion Access in Humanitarian Contexts.在人道主义背景下,自我管理堕胎扩大堕胎服务可及性的潜力。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Aug 13;2:681039. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.681039. eCollection 2021.
8
The health response to the Rohingya refugee crisis post August 2017: Reflections from two years of health sector coordination in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.2017 年 8 月后罗兴亚难民危机的卫生应对措施:来自孟加拉国考克斯巴扎尔卫生部门两年协调的思考。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0253013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253013. eCollection 2021.
9
Challenges and strategies in conducting sexual and reproductive health research among Rohingya refugees in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.在孟加拉国科克斯巴扎尔的罗兴亚难民中开展性与生殖健康研究的挑战与策略
Confl Health. 2020 Dec 1;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00329-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Wishful thinking versus operational commitment: is the international guidance on priority sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian settings becoming unrealistic?一厢情愿与实际行动:关于人道主义背景下性与生殖健康优先干预措施的国际指南是否正变得不切实际?
Confl Health. 2018 May 29;12:32. doi: 10.1186/s13031-018-0157-x. eCollection 2018.
2
The 2018 Inter-agency field manual on reproductive health in humanitarian settings: revising the global standards.《2018年人道主义环境下生殖健康机构间实地手册:修订全球标准》
Reprod Health Matters. 2017 Nov;25(51):18-24. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1403277. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
3
Protecting safe abortion in humanitarian settings: overcoming legal and policy barriers.在人道主义环境中保护安全堕胎:克服法律和政策障碍。
Reprod Health Matters. 2017 Nov;25(51):40-47. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1400361. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
4
Why Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides safe abortion care and what that involves.无国界医生组织(MSF)为何提供安全堕胎护理以及这涉及哪些方面。
Confl Health. 2016 Sep 21;10:19. doi: 10.1186/s13031-016-0086-5. eCollection 2016.
5
Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends.1990年至2014年期间的堕胎发生率:全球、区域和次区域层面及趋势。
Lancet. 2016 Jul 16;388(10041):258-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380-4. Epub 2016 May 11.
6
Why don't humanitarian organizations provide safe abortion services?为什么人道主义组织不提供安全堕胎服务?
Confl Health. 2016 Mar 24;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13031-016-0075-8. eCollection 2016.
7
Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studies.在三个人道主义环境中生殖健康服务的进展和差距:混合方法案例研究。
Confl Health. 2015 Feb 2;9(Suppl 1 Taking Stock of Reproductive Health in Humanitarian):S3. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-9-S1-S3. eCollection 2015.
8
Tracking humanitarian funding for reproductive health: a systematic analysis of health and protection proposals from 2002-2013.追踪生殖健康方面的人道主义资金:2002-2013 年卫生和保护提案的系统分析。
Confl Health. 2015 Feb 2;9(Suppl 1 Taking Stock of Reproductive Health in Humanitarian):S2. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-9-S1-S2. eCollection 2015.
9
The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States.美国合法人工流产与分娩的安全性比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):215-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823fe923.
10
Results of a UK survey of fatal anaphylaxis after oral amoxicillin.英国口服阿莫西林后致命过敏反应调查结果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Nov;60(5):1172-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm315. Epub 2007 Aug 30.