Delanaye Pierre, Melsom Toralf, Ebert Natalie, Bäck Sten-Erik, Mariat Christophe, Cavalier Etienne, Björk Jonas, Christensson Anders, Nyman Ulf, Porrini Esteban, Remuzzi Giuseppe, Ruggenenti Piero, Schaeffner Elke, Soveri Inga, Sterner Gunnar, Eriksen Bjørn Odvar, Gaspari Flavio
Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation , University of Liège Hospital (ULg CHU) , 4000 Liège , Belgium.
Metabolic and Renal Research Group , UiT The Arctic University of Norway and Section of Nephrology, University Hospital of North Norway , Tromsø , Norway.
Clin Kidney J. 2016 Oct;9(5):700-4. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw071. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
A reliable assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is of paramount importance in clinical practice as well as epidemiological and clinical research settings. It is recommended by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines in specific populations (anorectic, cirrhotic, obese, renal and non-renal transplant patients) where estimation equations are unreliable. Measured GFR is the only valuable test to confirm or confute the status of chronic kidney disease (CKD), to evaluate the slope of renal function decay over time, to assess the suitability of living kidney donors and for dosing of potentially toxic medication with a narrow therapeutic index. Abnormally elevated GFR or hyperfiltration in patients with diabetes or obesity can be correctly diagnosed only by measuring GFR. GFR measurement contributes to assessing the true CKD prevalence rate, avoiding discrepancies due to GFR estimation with different equations. Using measured GFR, successfully accomplished in large epidemiological studies, is the only way to study the potential link between decreased renal function and cardiovascular or total mortality, being sure that this association is not due to confounders, i.e. non-GFR determinants of biomarkers. In clinical research, it has been shown that measured GFR (or measured GFR slope) as a secondary endpoint as compared with estimated GFR detected subtle treatment effects and obtained these results with a comparatively smaller sample size than trials choosing estimated GFR. Measuring GFR by iohexol has several advantages: simplicity, low cost, stability and low interlaboratory variation. Iohexol plasma clearance represents the best chance for implementing a standardized GFR measurement protocol applicable worldwide both in clinical practice and in research.
在临床实践以及流行病学和临床研究环境中,对肾小球滤过率(GFR)进行可靠评估至关重要。《改善全球肾脏病预后》指南建议,在估算方程不可靠的特定人群(厌食症患者、肝硬化患者、肥胖患者、肾移植和非肾移植患者)中采用该评估方法。实测GFR是确认或反驳慢性肾脏病(CKD)状态、评估肾功能随时间衰减斜率、评估活体肾供体适用性以及确定治疗指数狭窄的潜在毒性药物剂量的唯一有价值的检测方法。只有通过测量GFR才能正确诊断糖尿病或肥胖患者异常升高的GFR或超滤情况。GFR测量有助于评估CKD的真实患病率,避免因使用不同方程估算GFR而产生的差异。在大型流行病学研究中成功采用实测GFR,是研究肾功能下降与心血管或全因死亡率之间潜在联系的唯一方法,确保这种关联不是由混杂因素(即生物标志物的非GFR决定因素)导致的。在临床研究中,已表明与估算GFR相比,将实测GFR(或实测GFR斜率)作为次要终点能检测到细微的治疗效果,并且与选择估算GFR的试验相比,以相对较小的样本量获得这些结果。采用碘海醇测量GFR有几个优点:操作简单、成本低、稳定性好且实验室间差异小。碘海醇血浆清除率是在临床实践和研究中实施适用于全球的标准化GFR测量方案的最佳选择。