Alfes Jana, Bucksch Jens, Aue Katja, Demetriou Yolanda
Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33501, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
Plattform Ernährung und Bewegung e. V., Berlin, Deutschland.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Nov;59(11):1443-1451. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2452-2.
Sedentary behaviour is itself a health-related behaviour. This systematic review examines whether family-based interventions can reduce sitting time among children and adolescents and which variables moderate potential intervention effects.
Using a systematic literature search we identified family-based randomised controlled intervention studies that focus on sedentary behaviour in 3‑ to 18-year-old children and youth. The methodological quality of studies as well as the intervention effects according to different outcomes (screen-based vs. overall sitting) were analysed and evaluated for moderating effects.
Of 29 studies, 17 reported significant effects and 11 studies showed positive trends for reduced sitting time. The content of interventions, the level of theoretical underpinning as well as the methodological quality of studies were heterogeneous. Most often, screen-based sitting and seldom overall sitting was examined. Concise characteristics of intervention success were not clearly apparent. The proportion of positive intervention effects was higher in reducing sitting in front of TVs compared to other outcomes. An analysis of moderators highlighted that intervention programs among pre-schoolers showed more often positive intervention effects.
There are many promising opportunities to reduce sitting time using family-based approaches. Statements in terms of replication of interventions and explanations of the effective mechanisms within interventions are limited. Therefore, future interventions should use subjective as well as objective evaluation measures and consider overall sitting time. To strengthen the basis of interventional effort in this research field, a theoretical planning approach is recommended.
久坐行为本身就是一种与健康相关的行为。本系统评价旨在探讨基于家庭的干预措施是否能减少儿童和青少年的久坐时间,以及哪些变量会调节潜在的干预效果。
通过系统的文献检索,我们确定了以3至18岁儿童和青少年久坐行为为重点的基于家庭的随机对照干预研究。分析并评估了研究的方法学质量以及不同结果(基于屏幕的久坐与总体久坐)的干预效果,以确定调节效应。
在29项研究中,17项报告了显著效果,11项研究显示久坐时间减少呈积极趋势。干预内容、理论基础水平以及研究的方法学质量各不相同。最常研究的是基于屏幕的久坐,很少研究总体久坐。干预成功的明确特征并不明显。与其他结果相比,减少看电视时的久坐时间,积极干预效果的比例更高。对调节因素的分析强调,学龄前儿童的干预项目更常显示出积极的干预效果。
采用基于家庭的方法减少久坐时间有很多有前景的机会。关于干预措施的重复实施以及干预措施内有效机制的解释方面的陈述有限。因此,未来的干预措施应使用主观和客观评估方法,并考虑总体久坐时间。为加强该研究领域干预工作的基础,建议采用理论规划方法。