Akhmetova Alma, Saliev Timur, Allan Iain U, Illsley Matthew J, Nurgozhin Talgat, Mikhalovsky Sergey
Alma Akhmetova, BSc, Laboratory of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan. Timur Saliev, MD, PhD, Laboratory of Translational Medicine and Life Sciences Technologies, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan. Iain U. Allan, PhD, School of Biomaterials and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom. Matthew J. Illsley, PhD, School of Biomaterials and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom. Talgat Nurgozhin, MD, PhD, Laboratory of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan. Sergey Mikhalovsky, PhD, School of Biomaterials and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom; and School of Engineering, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;43(6):598-609. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000273.
The process of wound healing is often accompanied by bacterial infection or critical colonization, resulting in protracted inflammation, delayed reepithelization, and production of pungent odors. The malodor produced by these wounds may lower health-related quality of life and produce psychological discomfort and social isolation. Current management focuses on reducing bacterial activity within the wound site and absorbing malodorous gases. For example, charcoal-based materials have been incorporated into dressing for direct adsorption of the responsible gases. In addition, multiple topical agents, including silver, iodine, honey, sugar, and essential oils, have been suggested for incorporation into dressings in an attempt to control the underlying bacterial infection. This review describes options for controlling malodor in chronic wounds, the benefits and drawbacks of each topical agent, and their mode of action. We also discuss the use of subjective odor evaluation techniques to assess the efficacy of odor-controlling therapies. The perspectives of employing novel biomaterials and technologies for wound odor management are also presented.
伤口愈合过程常伴有细菌感染或严重定植,导致炎症迁延、上皮再形成延迟,并产生刺鼻气味。这些伤口产生的恶臭可能会降低与健康相关的生活质量,造成心理不适和社交孤立。目前的治疗重点是降低伤口部位的细菌活性并吸收恶臭气体。例如,基于木炭的材料已被纳入敷料中,用于直接吸附产生气味的气体。此外,包括银、碘、蜂蜜、糖和精油在内的多种局部用药已被建议纳入敷料中,以试图控制潜在的细菌感染。本综述描述了控制慢性伤口恶臭的方法、每种局部用药的优缺点及其作用方式。我们还讨论了使用主观气味评估技术来评估气味控制疗法的疗效。本文还介绍了采用新型生物材料和技术进行伤口气味管理的观点。