Spanos N P, Perlini A H, Robertson L A
J Abnorm Psychol. 1989 Aug;98(3):285-93. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.98.3.285.
Two experiments compared placebo and hypnotic analgesia in high and low hypnotizable subjects. Experiment 1 demonstrated that hypnotic and placebo analgesia were equally ineffective in low hypnotizables, but that hypnotic analgesia was much more effective than placebo analgesia in high hypnotizables. Experiment 2 replicated these results, but also included low and high hypnotizables who were given a nonhypnotic suggestion for analgesia. Both the low and high hypnotizables in this group reported greater suggested than placebo analgesia and as much suggested analgesia as high hypnotizable hypnotic subjects. Both experiments found substantial discrepancies between the amount of pain reduction subjects expected from the various treatments and the amount of pain reduction they actually reported following exposure to those treatments. In Experiment 2, subjects in all treatments who reduced reported pain engaged in more cognitive coping and less catastrophizing than those who did not reduce pain. Theoretical implications are discussed.
两项实验比较了高催眠易感性和低催眠易感性受试者的安慰剂镇痛和催眠镇痛效果。实验1表明,催眠镇痛和安慰剂镇痛在低催眠易感性受试者中同样无效,但在高催眠易感性受试者中,催眠镇痛比安慰剂镇痛有效得多。实验2重复了这些结果,且纳入了接受非催眠性镇痛暗示的低催眠易感性和高催眠易感性受试者。该组中的低催眠易感性和高催眠易感性受试者均报告称,暗示镇痛比安慰剂镇痛效果更佳,且暗示镇痛效果与高催眠易感性的催眠受试者相同。两项实验均发现,受试者对各种治疗预期的疼痛减轻量与他们在接受这些治疗后实际报告的疼痛减轻量之间存在显著差异。在实验2中,所有报告疼痛减轻的治疗组受试者比未减轻疼痛的受试者更多地采用认知应对方式,且较少产生灾难化思维。本文讨论了相关理论意义。