De Pascalis V, Perrone M
Department of Psychology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy.
Int J Psychophysiol. 1996 Feb-Mar;21(2-3):163-75. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00050-x.
This study evaluates the effects of hypnotic analgesia and hypnosis on bilateral EEG activity recorded from frontal, central and posterior areas during three painful electrical stimulation conditions: waking, hypnosis/no-analgesia, hypnosis/analgesia. Eight high-hypnotizable and eight low-hypnotizable (right handed) subjects participated in the experiment. The following measures were obtained: pain and distress tolerance ratings; EEG spectral amplitudes for the frequency bands: delta (0.5-3.75 Hz), theta 1 (4-5.75 Hz), theta 2 (6-7.75 Hz), alpha 1 (8-9.75 Hz), alpha 2 (10-12.75 Hz), beta 1 (13-15.75 Hz), beta 2 (16-31.75 Hz), total band (0.5-31.75 Hz), '40-Hz' (36-44 Hz); cardiac interbeat interval (ms); mid-frequency and high-frequency peaks from power spectral analysis of heart period variability. During hypnosis/analgesia, high hypnotizable subjects displayed significant reductions in pain and distress scores compared to hypnosis/no-analgesia and waking conditions. In each experimental condition these subjects displayed significant lower total and beta 1 amplitudes compared to low hypnotizables. High hypnotizables, on central and posterior recording sites, during both hypnosis/analgesia and hypnosis/no-analgesia conditions also showed total and delta EEG amplitude reductions in both hemispheres and a theta 1 amplitude reduction in the left hemisphere. However, for total, delta and beta 1 bands in the hypnosis/analgesia condition the amplitude reduction was more pronounced in the right hemisphere as shown by hemispheric asymmetry in favor of the left hemisphere. Low hypnotizables, on posterior recording sites, displayed a delta amplitude reduction during hypnosis/no-analgesia and hypnosis/analgesia conditions. These subjects also showed, for all recording sites, a reduction in theta 1 amplitude during hypnosis/no-analgesia compared to the waking condition. Lows, however, failed in evidencing amplitude differences between hypnosis/no-analgesia and hypnosis/analgesia conditions. During hypnotic analgesia the hemispheric asymmetry found in high hypnotizables was parallel to a significant reduction in the spectral mid-frequency peak of heart period variability which indicated a decrease in the level of sympathetic activity. In contrast, during hypnosis/no-analgesia the EEG amplitude reduction was not paralleled by a decrease in sympathetic activity.
本研究评估了催眠镇痛和催眠对在三种疼痛性电刺激条件下(清醒、催眠/无镇痛、催眠/镇痛)从额叶、中央和后部区域记录的双侧脑电图活动的影响。八名高催眠易感性和八名低催眠易感性(右利手)受试者参与了该实验。获得了以下测量数据:疼痛和痛苦耐受评分;各频段的脑电图频谱幅度:δ波(0.5 - 3.75赫兹)、θ1波(4 - 5.75赫兹)、θ2波(6 - 7.75赫兹)、α1波(8 - 9.75赫兹)、α2波(10 - 12.75赫兹)、β1波(13 - 15.75赫兹)、β2波(16 - 31.75赫兹)、全频段(0.5 - 31.75赫兹)、“40赫兹”频段(36 - 44赫兹);心脏搏动间期(毫秒);心脏周期变异性功率谱分析的中频和高频峰值。在催眠/镇痛期间,与催眠/无镇痛和清醒条件相比,高催眠易感性受试者的疼痛和痛苦评分显著降低。在每种实验条件下,这些受试者的全频段和β1波幅度与低催眠易感性受试者相比显著更低。高催眠易感性受试者在中央和后部记录部位,在催眠/镇痛和催眠/无镇痛条件下,两个半球的全频段和δ波脑电图幅度也都降低,左半球的θ1波幅度降低。然而,在催眠/镇痛条件下,对于全频段、δ波和β1波频段,右半球的幅度降低更为明显,表现为有利于左半球的半球不对称性。低催眠易感性受试者在后部记录部位,在催眠/无镇痛和催眠/镇痛条件下δ波幅度降低。与清醒条件相比,这些受试者在所有记录部位,在催眠/无镇痛期间θ1波幅度也降低。然而,低催眠易感性受试者未能证明催眠/无镇痛和催眠/镇痛条件之间的幅度差异。在催眠镇痛期间,高催眠易感性受试者中发现的半球不对称性与心脏周期变异性频谱中频峰值的显著降低平行,这表明交感神经活动水平降低。相比之下,在催眠/无镇痛期间,脑电图幅度降低并未伴随着交感神经活动的降低。