• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Editorial: Designing and evaluating digital health interventions.

作者信息

Bul Kim, Holliday Nikki, Luhanga Edith Talina

机构信息

Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry Universitry, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2025 May 8;7:1612380. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1612380. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1612380
PMID:40405909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12095270/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/12095270/8e9cb0ca3c82/fdgth-07-1612380-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/12095270/8e9cb0ca3c82/fdgth-07-1612380-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/12095270/8e9cb0ca3c82/fdgth-07-1612380-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Editorial: Designing and evaluating digital health interventions.社论：数字健康干预措施的设计与评估
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 8;7:1612380. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1612380. eCollection 2025.
2
Digital Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behaviors of Office Workers: Scoping Review.减少上班族久坐行为的数字干预措施：范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 7;21(2):e11079. doi: 10.2196/11079.
3
Designing Digital Interventions for Eating Disorders.设计饮食失调的数字干预措施。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Apr;25(4):125-138. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01415-x. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
4
Trauma-Informed Care in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review.数字健康技术中的创伤知情护理：范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 23;12:e46842. doi: 10.2196/46842.
5
Practitioner review: Co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people.从业者评论：与儿童和青少年共同设计数字心理健康技术。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):928-940. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13258. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
[Implementation and participatory design of digital health interventions].数字健康干预措施的实施与参与式设计
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Feb;63(2):145-152. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03079-6.
7
Applying a Social Determinants of Health Framework to Guide Digital Innovations That Reduce Disparities in Chronic Disease.运用健康社会决定因素框架指导减少慢性病差异的数字创新。
Psychosom Med. 2023 Sep 1;85(7):659-669. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001176. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
8
Developing and Evaluating Digital Public Health Interventions Using the Digital Public Health Framework DigiPHrame: A Framework Development Study.利用数字公共卫生框架 DigiPHrame 开发和评估数字公共卫生干预措施：框架开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 12;26:e54269. doi: 10.2196/54269.
9
Co-producing digital mental health interventions: A systematic review.共同制作数字心理健康干预措施：一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Apr 25;10:20552076241239172. doi: 10.1177/20552076241239172. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
An Evaluation Service for Digital Public Health Interventions: User-Centered Design Approach.数字公共卫生干预措施评估服务：以用户为中心的设计方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 8;23(9):e28356. doi: 10.2196/28356.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital health interventions for all? Examining inclusivity across all stages of the digital health intervention research process.数字健康干预面向所有人？审视数字健康干预研究过程各个阶段的包容性。
Trials. 2024 Jan 30;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07937-w.
2
Effectiveness of a blended school-based mindfulness program for the prevention of co-rumination and internalizing problems in Dutch secondary school girls: a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于混合的学校正念项目预防荷兰中学女生共沉思和内化问题的效果：一项群组随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Jan 12;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07885-x.
3
Co-creation of a complex, multicomponent rehabilitation intervention and feasibility trial protocol for the PostUraL tachycardia Syndrome Exercise (PULSE) study.
为“尿毒症后心动过速综合征运动（PULSE）研究”共同创建一项复杂的多组分康复干预措施及可行性试验方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Aug 15;9(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01365-4.
4
Can a Single Variable Predict Early Dropout From Digital Health Interventions? Comparison of Predictive Models From Two Large Randomized Trials.单一变量能否预测数字健康干预的早期辍学？来自两项大型随机试验的预测模型比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 20;25:e43629. doi: 10.2196/43629.
5
Evaluation Methods Applied to Digital Health Interventions: What Is Being Used beyond Randomised Controlled Trials?-A Scoping Review.评估数字健康干预措施的方法：除了随机对照试验，还在使用哪些方法？——一项范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;19(9):5221. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095221.
6
Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era.迈向数字健康公平 - 在 COVID-19 时代，弱势群体在使用数字健康服务方面所面临挑战的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 12;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07584-4.
7
Medical Research Council framework for development and evaluation of complex interventions: A comprehensive guidance.医学研究委员会复杂干预措施的开发与评估框架：全面指南
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Apr 28;9:88. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_649_19. eCollection 2020.
8
Telehealth interventions for reducing waiting lists and waiting times for specialist outpatient services: A scoping review.远程医疗干预措施减少专科门诊服务的候诊名单和候诊时间：范围综述。
J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Dec;22(8):504-512. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16670495. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.更好的干预措施报告：干预描述和复制（TIDieR）清单和指南模板。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.