Suppr超能文献

体外受精患者经阴道取卵时使用全静脉麻醉的熵值与标准临床监测对比

Entropy vs standard clinical monitoring using total intravenous anesthesia during transvaginal oocyte retrieval in patients for in vitro fertilization.

作者信息

Tewari Saipriya, Bhadoria Poonam, Wadhawan Sonia, Prasad Sudha, Kohli Amit

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226014, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002, India.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 May 3.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Day care surgery is an important arena for monitors of anesthetic depth where minimizing drug use is essential for rapid turnover. Underdosage, on the other hand, carries the risks of intraoperative awareness and pain. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR), often performed under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl in Indian patients, is a procedure of special interest because, in addition to the above concerns, toxic effects of propofol on oocytes have been described. We have studied the role of entropy monitor, a depth of anesthesia monitor, in optomising drug titration and facilitating distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of anesthesia.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled study.

SETTING

Operating theater and postoperative recovery area.

PATIENTS

One hundred twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II female patients coming to the IVF centre for TVOR under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl. They were randomly allocated into 2 groups: Group EM (drugs titrated as per entropy values: state entropy and response entropy) and group CM (drugs titrated as per standard clinical monitoring).

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS

Total propofol consumption (TP), total fentanyl consumption (TF), on-table recovery time (T1), time to discharge (T2), intraoperative awareness (A).

MAIN RESULTS

Patients in group EM demonstrated 6.7% lesser consumption of propofol (P= .01), 10.9% more consumption of fentanyl (P= .007) and 1 minute faster recovery on-table (P= .009) as compared to group CM. In the PACU, only 10% patients of group EM required supplemental analgesia as opposed to 28.3% in CM group (P= .01). Time to discharge was similar in both groups and no intraoperative awareness was noted.

CONCLUSION

Entropy monitor is a useful tool allowing distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of general anesthesia in patients undergoing TVOR and facilitating drug titration accordingly. Its impact on intraoperative awareness needs to be further evaluated.

摘要

研究目的

日间手术是麻醉深度监测的一个重要领域,在该领域中尽量减少药物使用对于快速周转至关重要。另一方面,剂量不足会带来术中知晓和疼痛的风险。经阴道取卵术(TVOR)在印度患者中通常在使用丙泊酚和芬太尼的全静脉麻醉下进行,这是一个特别值得关注的手术,因为除了上述问题外,丙泊酚对卵母细胞的毒性作用也已被描述。我们研究了熵监测器(一种麻醉深度监测器)在优化药物滴定以及区分麻醉的镇痛和催眠成分方面的作用。

设计

前瞻性随机对照研究。

地点

手术室和术后恢复区。

患者

120例美国麻醉医师协会I级和II级的女性患者,她们因经阴道取卵术前往体外受精中心,接受使用丙泊酚和芬太尼的全静脉麻醉。她们被随机分为两组:EM组(根据熵值即状态熵和反应熵滴定药物)和CM组(根据标准临床监测滴定药物)。

干预

无。

测量指标

丙泊酚总消耗量(TP)、芬太尼总消耗量(TF)、手术台上恢复时间(T1)、出院时间(T2)、术中知晓情况(A)。

主要结果

与CM组相比,EM组患者的丙泊酚消耗量减少了6.7%(P = 0.01),芬太尼消耗量增加了10.9%(P = 0.007),手术台上恢复时间快1分钟(P = 0.009)。在麻醉后恢复室,EM组只有10%的患者需要补充镇痛,而CM组为28.3%(P = 0.01)。两组的出院时间相似,且未观察到术中知晓情况。

结论

熵监测器是一种有用的工具,可用于区分接受经阴道取卵术患者全身麻醉的镇痛和催眠成分,并据此促进药物滴定。其对术中知晓的影响需要进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验